Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Revison 2.17-2 - updated
Hi, Added another FAQ item, 4.6, to respond the blog accusing the group of having pulled the figure of $10M out of a hat (http://icannology.blogspot.com/2010/10/pulling-numbers-out-of-hat.html). Not sure people will agree with my accounting, please look it over. Further estimates and tuning of the explanation invited. Also spent some time on the plane thinking about an explanation for why we think the financial continued operations requirements should be decreased from 3 years to 1 or less. While I understand that it is a barrier to entry, I am not sure I have an explanation for why it should be lowered for those who have financial need. I tend to see it something that people may need help with and perhaps a guarantee fund in addition to the suggestion on risk groups should be suggested as remedies. And tough I am sure that it is because I just did not understand, but I do not have an argument for why the registrants and users of a qualifying applicant merit a lower commitment to continuity. I have not problem with the logic of this as a general program issue, but don't understand what is specific to the support program. So this is one I won't be writing, and if someone want this explained in the faq, they should write it. BTW, I am _not_ suggesting it be taken out, just that I can't explain it. We have consensus on it, so someone must be able to explain. a. On 16 Oct 2010, at 01:22, Avri Doria wrote: > Hi, > > I think I have done what was discussed at today's meeting. > > There are, as might be expected some major rewrites in some sections, > specifically, > > - name of the document - from final report to milestone report > - the abstract to explain that name change > - sections 2.7, 2.11, 3a and the final para of 3. > > I am sure it is full of typos and other things that need comment and > correction. > But it is time for Friday dinner and I wanted to get it sent out to the group. > > As I mentioned I will be traveling tomorrow, but will work on updating this > I can. > > a. > > > <Draft Final Report JAS WG v2.17-2.doc> Attachment:
Draft Final Report JAS WG v2.17-3.doc
|