Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] rev 2.19-1 after listening to the phone call.

[Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>]

Hi,

But we held a poll. 

On 21 Oct 2010, at 21:28, Eric Brunner-Williams wrote:

> 
> On continuity:
> 
> I agree with Tijani on the WG's on-list and on-call record is that there was 
> more support for 6 months than for 12 or 36

on this one the wording on the poll could be seen as ambiguous.  
And that is why I asked the question which no one has answered yet.

Tell does it really make that great a diference between 6 months and 12 months?

I understand that there was consensus for less than 36.  but is 6 versus 12 a 
criticial issue?
if so, why?


> months.
> 
> On eligibility:
> 
> I agree with Tijani on the WG's on-list and on-call record is that the 
> opposition to support for entrepreneurs from developing countries who meet 
> the need criterion was very limited.

On this one, I think the pool was quite clear and I interpret it as people who 
had not spoken up before, spoke up in the poll.

That is part of running the poll.

a.