On 21 Oct 2010, at 21:28, Eric Brunner-Williams wrote:
On continuity:
I agree with Tijani on the WG's on-list and on-call record is that there was
more support for 6 months than for 12 or 36
on this one the wording on the poll could be seen as ambiguous.
And that is why I asked the question which no one has answered yet.
Tell does it really make that great a diference between 6 months and 12 months?
I understand that there was consensus for less than 36. but is 6 versus 12 a
criticial issue?
if so, why?
months.
On eligibility:
I agree with Tijani on the WG's on-list and on-call record is that the
opposition to support for entrepreneurs from developing countries who meet the
need criterion was very limited.
On this one, I think the pool was quite clear and I interpret it as people who
had not spoken up before, spoke up in the poll.
That is part of running the poll.
a.