<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] 9 Nov meeting
- To: soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] 9 Nov meeting
- From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 18:12:31 -0500
Hi,
Ok, with me.
I guess.
Though I think I would prefer to gear the session to what needs yet to be done
than to what has already been done. and think it would be good to have
discussion as opposed to a panel talking. People can read the report and it
might be good to have a Brief Q&A, but I would personally hate to spend the
time in rehash.
So do we forget about working on a charter update?
a.
On 8 Nov 2010, at 18:04, Karla Valente wrote:
> Dear Avri, Evan:
>
> For the agenda tomorrow, could we maybe discuss the Cartagena session?
> This is what we got so far:
>
> Title: Developing Countries and New gTLDs
> Date/time: Thursday, Dec 9 from 9:30 to 10:30
> Overview *
> In this session, members from the Joint SO/AC New gTLD Applicant Support
> Working Group will present highlights of the Milestone Report. The main
> objective of this Working Group is to develop a sustainable approach in
> providing support to applicants requiring assistance in applying for and
> operating new gTLDs Registries.
> Agenda *
> The main recommendations
> What is next?
> Who should attend? *
> Anyone interested in the New gTLD Program; individuals and entities
> interested in providing support or getting involved in this initiative.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Karla Valente
> +1 310 936 4639
>
> From: owner-soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Evan Leibovitch
> Sent: Monday, November 08, 2010 1:20 PM
> To: Avri Doria
> Cc: soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] 9 Nov meeting
>
> I have no preference.
>
> - Evan
>
>
>
> On 8 November 2010 16:07, Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> hi,
>
> At the moment, I do not have anything on the agenda other than work on te
> charter update request motion.
>
> If we want to have that on the next GNSO agenda, it needs to be done by
> Wednesday.
>
> On the the other had, if we are willing to wait until the meeting in
> Cartagena, once the document has been translated and released, we can take
> another week or so to finish the proposed amendments.
>
> Do people have an opinion? If we are not in a rush, we can skip Tuesday's
> meeting and focus on having the Friday meeting to work on the charter
> extension motions.
>
> thanks
>
> a.
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|