Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Agenda for 9 Nov

[Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>]

Hi,

Thanks for this.

I think you are right, but I want to make sure that we have the right items on 
the list.  I think the GNSO Council procedure is a little more strict that the 
ALAC procedure, in terms of having a motion worded and published a week before 
the meeting.  

I personally would like to see us get it on the next meetings agenda, which 
means Rafik submitting it tomorrow.  That is why I introduced the shell of a 
motion last week.  We do not need to worry about all the whereas clause that 
seem to have become a fact of life in the GNSO explaining how we got here and 
what the issue is, but I want to make sure we do not have issues with the list 
of activities.

thanks

a.

On 9 Nov 2010, at 07:21, carlos dionisio aguirre wrote:

> Dear Avri. All. : It seems to me, in relation with your point -charter 
> extension- the point must not be so complicated. In my point of view, we need 
> to communicate our work (sending the final document made by us) and  require 
> from GNSO Council and ALAC their approve.  In this case the letter to send it 
> must be very simple, we not need to discuss a lot what must be the tenour of 
> this letter. my two cents. 
> Carlos Dionisio Aguirre
> 
> ALAC member by LACRALO - ICANN
> Abogado - Especialista en Derecho de los Negocios
> Sarmiento 71 - 4to. 18 Cordoba - Argentina -
> *54-351-424-2123 / 423-5423
> http://ar.ageiadensi.org 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > From: avri@xxxxxxx
> > Subject: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Agenda for 9 Nov
> > Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 07:05:58 -0500
> > To: soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx
> > 
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I seem to have confused the works.
> > 
> > We do still have a meeting today. In about an hour from when I am sending 
> > this message - at out normal UTC time of 1300 - I leave the relative time 
> > up to you all.
> > 
> > the Agenda:
> > 
> > - Planning for Catagena
> > - Last comments on the Press Releases (have we seen an update?)
> > - Charter extension
> > - do we want to ask out liaison to file the motion with the GNSO Council 
> > and ALAC this week
> > - If so, discuss the draft motion.
> > 
> > The poll of sharing the schedule pain will come out sometime today. Though 
> > as I said in scheduling times, in all previous such polls I have seen, the 
> > tyranny of the majority timezones prevails. But it might be different this 
> > time. I know the Board rotates timezones.
> > 
> > Talk to you all in a bit.
> > 
> > a.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >