Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] proposal for JAS session - Thursday 9 - 10 AM EDT

[Elaine Pruis <elaine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I like this plan; it echoes Tijani's suggestion.

I would much rather spend our time hearing from the audience and discussing 
future work than have a panel of WG members reiterate what is  already widely 
publicized.

Some of you may recall PDT's "talk show" format for a session in LA several 
years ago. It worked and was an interesting way to engage the audience.

Best Regards,

Elaine


On Nov 30, 2010, at 8:09 AM, Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> 
> hi,
> 
> Here is my proposal for how the session is run.  Alternate proposal are of 
> course welcome and the group can decide.
> 
> I am proposing that his is not a panel discussion, but rather a report and 
> dialogue.  I believe need to do the following in the hour:
> 
> - raise awareness of what has been done
> - raise awareness of what needs to be done
> - give people a view into the continuing conversations on details
> - open up to feedback and advice
> - get support and more involvement
> 
> Agenda for the meeting - keeping it simple and using as little time as 
> necessary for meeting overhead:
> 
> - If it fits his schedule it would be good to get Sebastien as  member who s 
> not on the Board to give a quick intro on the importance of the work.
> 
> - Either Evan on I give the presentation with frequent opportunities for 
> conversation from the floor, including amplifications by JAS Wg members, 
> questions/comments form others.  Either Evan or I (i.e the other one) 
> moderates the floor discussion, keeps it moving and limits the time people 
> speak.
> 
> - We end with the status of the charter renewal and with an appeal for people 
> to comment formally on the report and to get involved
> 
> a.
> 
>