RE: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] proposal for JAS session - Thursday 9 - 10 AM EDT

[carlos dionisio aguirre <carlosaguirre62@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Early in the morning (mine), I sent an email where I explained my proposal, 
very simple: I said

".... in relation with our work and the presentation of our work at thursday 
meeting, I think we need to put on stage the people who more actively work 
during our 7 months teleconferences. So, I propose to be on stage Obviously 
Evan and Avri, and Tijani and Andrew.
 I have no problem to be there if you consider convinient."

The idea was similar than the Brussels presentation:  we make the presentation 
on the stage and people after we finish, ask questions. no more than that  

But now after to hear your proposal I liked the idea to put on the stage 
Sebastien to give a quick intro on the importance of the work.

As you can see my proposal is simple and less complicated. Your idea is 
fantastic but I (particularly) think would be difficult to manage with 
different scenarios in the meeting  room. 

For your proposal I think we need to make an elaborated  plan in order to not 
confuse the positions among us. If we have time to discuss the participation of 
each one of us, your proposal is very good.
I want you understand what is my afraid, a session no clear, conflictive and 
caotic that we will can not manage.

But I insist, if we have time to organize our roles into the meeting room, your 
proposal appear fantastic.  

I`m open to other ideas. 


Carlos Dionisio Aguirre
ALAC member by LACRALO - ICANN
Abogado - Especialista en Derecho de los Negocios
Sarmiento 71 - 4to. 18 Cordoba - Argentina -
*54-351-424-2123 / 423-5423
http://ar.ageiadensi.org 




> Subject: Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] proposal for JAS session - Thursday  9 - 
> 10 AM EDT
> From: avri@xxxxxxx
> Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 13:13:22 -0500
> CC: soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx
> To: carlosaguirre62@xxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> 
> Dear Carlos,
> 
> Well what are you suggesting we do instead?
> 
> The majority has not spoken, so if you have another idea, please post it.  
> I am just fine with withdrawing my suggestion and letting others organize the 
> event as they see fit.
> 
> 
> 
> a.
> 
> 
> On 30 Nov 2010, at 12:50, carlos dionisio aguirre wrote:
> 
> > Dear Avri: 
> > 
> > Interesting proposal, but difficult to manage the debate. many things to 
> > put in order, and achieve a clear and succesfull meeting. my two cents.
> > obviously the mayority decide.
> > 
> > Carlos Dionisio Aguirre
> > 
> > ALAC member by LACRALO - ICANN
> > Abogado - Especialista en Derecho de los Negocios
> > Sarmiento 71 - 4to. 18 Cordoba - Argentina -
> > *54-351-424-2123 / 423-5423
> > http://ar.ageiadensi.org 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > > From: avri@xxxxxxx
> > > Subject: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] proposal for JAS session - Thursday 9 - 
> > > 10 AM EDT
> > > Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 11:09:06 -0500
> > > To: soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx
> > > 
> > > 
> > > hi,
> > > 
> > > Here is my proposal for how the session is run. Alternate proposal are of 
> > > course welcome and the group can decide.
> > > 
> > > I am proposing that his is not a panel discussion, but rather a report 
> > > and dialogue. I believe need to do the following in the hour:
> > > 
> > > - raise awareness of what has been done
> > > - raise awareness of what needs to be done
> > > - give people a view into the continuing conversations on details
> > > - open up to feedback and advice
> > > - get support and more involvement
> > > 
> > > Agenda for the meeting - keeping it simple and using as little time as 
> > > necessary for meeting overhead:
> > > 
> > > - If it fits his schedule it would be good to get Sebastien as member who 
> > > s not on the Board to give a quick intro on the importance of the work.
> > > 
> > > - Either Evan on I give the presentation with frequent opportunities for 
> > > conversation from the floor, including amplifications by JAS Wg members, 
> > > questions/comments form others. Either Evan or I (i.e the other one) 
> > > moderates the floor discussion, keeps it moving and limits the time 
> > > people speak.
> > > 
> > > - We end with the status of the charter renewal and with an appeal for 
> > > people to comment formally on the report and to get involved
> > > 
> > > a.
> > > 
> > > 
> 
>