Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] In lieu of a call today ...

[Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>]

hi,

having covered 1 and 3 in my last message, here is 2.

btw, i have made my proposals as an independent participant with no thought 
that i was representing the JAS WG.  I did try to pull out of the discussion, 
and refused to lead it as that would have forced me to be too neutral, but 
various things that were said inspired me to be active.

Attachment: JAS MOTION REDLINE svg edit.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document

a.



On 4 Jan 2011, at 12:32, Tijani BEN JEMAA wrote:

> Dear Eric,
> 
> Perhaps I lost the track, but I don’t know the 3 draft motions. Can you 
> please attach them or give a link to them.
> 
> Thank you Eric
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> Tijani BEN JEMAA
> Executive Director
> Mediterranean Federation of Internet Associations
> Phone : + 216 70 825 231
> Mobile : + 216 98 330 114
> Fax     : + 216 70 825 231
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : owner-soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx] De la part de Eric 
> Brunner-Williams
> Envoyé : mardi 4 janvier 2011 17:30
> À : soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx
> Objet : [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] In lieu of a call today ...
> 
> 
> Colleagues,
> 
> From my perspective, the ad hoc group suggested by the Names Council
> on the 8th, the call for volunteers for which Glen announced to the
> soac-newgtldapsup-wg on the 22nd, has one day to decide if it is going
> to decide anything on the JAS WG re-charter issue in time for the
> Names Council to consider a motion on January 15th.
> 
> There are now three draft motions, the second I personally find the
> least conductive to what I think the JAS WG should or can attempt now
> that the Milestone Report is out for comment.
> 
> Cheers,
> Eric