<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] JAS New gTLD Applicant Support WG Charter
- To: JAS <soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx>, ALAC Working List <alac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] JAS New gTLD Applicant Support WG Charter
- From: Drake William <william.drake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2011 10:13:57 +0100
Hi
On Jan 14, 2011, at 10:17 PM, Evan Leibovitch wrote:
> Clearly this problem was not considered important by the GNSO when it voted
> down the WG-proposed (and ALAC-endorsed) WG charter.
On Jan 14, 2011, at 2:08 PM, Avri Doria wrote:
> I think the current attitude of the GNSO Council, indeed, does not bode well
> for future efforts.
> Or even for some past efforts.
One small and obvious point may be worth bearing in mind when framing this: the
Council was and is not of one mind, JAS has always had strong support from
noncommercial types, and if memory serves 5 of 6 NCSG Councilors plus 2 NCAs
voted for Rafik's motion.
Best,
Bill
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|