[soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Re: Substance, please?

[Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>]

+ 10^100 = + Googol (cannot support it more than that!    + 
Googolplex would be downright silly)
At 17/01/2011 11:56 PM, Evan Leibovitch wrote:
> IMO, the most disappointing element of all this discussion is that 
> it has taken complete focus off of the actual task of this working 
> group. It's as if we've been struck with the same process-obsession 
> that has struck the GNSO.
> As I find myself with a doctor's appointment (scheduled before the 
> holidays) that unfortunately conflicts with today's call, I must 
> send my regrets. I hope to be in on at least part of it via mobile. 
> I strongly encourage this group to re-focus on debating the 
> substance of why it exists, and leave the remaining process circus 
> to the chartering bodies.
> As of right now, the JAS group has in its hands an ALAC endorsement 
> of its propsed re-charter, and the GNSO approval of a subset of 
> that. Very well. When this group produces its final product, the 
> chartering orgs are welcome to cherry-pick which components they 
> will consider sufficiently within scope to support.
> In the meantime, we have a difficult job still ahead of us 
> regardless of whose charter one looks at. We need to get on with it.
> - Evan