Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Summary of Milestone Report Public Forum - JAs WG

[Michael Palage <michael@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Eric,

I was wondering if you could point me to the document/standard by  
which ICANN is to "disregard" public comments?
Having participated in ICANN since it's creation I am aware of no such  
standard.
However I am always rather to learn new things.

Best regards

Michael



Sent from my iPhone

On Feb 9, 2011, at 3:47 PM, Eric Brunner-Williams <ebw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> wrote:
> Karla,
>
> The misuse of ICANN's public comments mechanism by a party engaging  
> in self-promotion should not be overlooked.
> The message signed by Yousef Nebuyu makes no concrete reference to  
> any part of the Milestone Report.
> Having listened to the same person misuse the open comments period  
> in the GAC-Board session at Cartegena to draw attention to a claim  
> by his group that his group uniquely holds a Treaty Organization's  
> authorization to apply to ICANN on behalf of a Treaty Organization  
> for a regional identifier, I cannot honestly excuse the conduct due  
> to unfamiliarity with the language, or purpose, of public comments.
> The comments of Mr. Nebuyu should be given the same read-and-discard  
> treatment as Mr. Kirikos' earlier comment.
> Eric