RES: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Summary of Milestone Report Public Forum - JAs WG

["Vanda UOL" <vanda@xxxxxxxxxx>]

I am with you Michael -  I haven´t seen such behavior 

Vanda Scartezini
Polo Consultores Associados
IT Trend
Alameda Santos 1470 – 1407,8
01418-903 São Paulo,SP, Brasil
Tel + 5511 3266.6253
Mob + 55118181.1464

-----Mensagem original-----
De: owner-soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx] Em nome de Michael Palage
Enviada em: quarta-feira, 9 de fevereiro de 2011 19:28
Para: Eric Brunner-Williams
Cc: Karla Valente; SOAC-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Assunto: Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Summary of Milestone Report Public Forum
- JAs WG


Eric,

I was wondering if you could point me to the document/standard by which
ICANN is to "disregard" public comments?

Having participated in ICANN since it's creation I am aware of no such
standard.

However I am always rather to learn new things.

Best regards

Michael



Sent from my iPhone

On Feb 9, 2011, at 3:47 PM, Eric Brunner-Williams <ebw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> wrote:

>
> Karla,
>
> The misuse of ICANN's public comments mechanism by a party engaging in 
> self-promotion should not be overlooked.
>
> The message signed by Yousef Nebuyu makes no concrete reference to any 
> part of the Milestone Report.
>
> Having listened to the same person misuse the open comments period in 
> the GAC-Board session at Cartegena to draw attention to a claim by his 
> group that his group uniquely holds a Treaty Organization's 
> authorization to apply to ICANN on behalf of a Treaty Organization for 
> a regional identifier, I cannot honestly excuse the conduct due to 
> unfamiliarity with the language, or purpose, of public comments.
>
> The comments of Mr. Nebuyu should be given the same read-and-discard 
> treatment as Mr. Kirikos' earlier comment.
>
> Eric
>
>