ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[soac-newgtldapsup-wg]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Adobe Connect - Chat Transcript from Joint SO/AC WG on New gTLD Applicant Support

  • To: "SOAC-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx" <SOAC-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Adobe Connect - Chat Transcript from Joint SO/AC WG on New gTLD Applicant Support
  • From: Gisella Gruber-White <Gisella.Gruber-White@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 09:17:45 -0700

FYI
Thank you
Kind regards,
Gisella

On 03/05/2011 15:36, "Gisella Gruber-White"
<Gisella.Gruber-White@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>  Gisella Gruber-White:Welcome to the JAS Meeting on Tuesday 03 May 2011
>  Gisella Gruber-White:Discussion document:
>https://community.icann.org/display/jaswg/JAS+Issues+and+Recommendations
>  Cintra Sooknanan:Tijani I put it in
>  Dev Anand Teelucksingh:minor suggested wordsmithing change : "A
>Community based application such as cultural, linguistic and ethnic" to
>"Application must be a community based gTLD that is operated for the
>benefit of either a cultural, linguistic or ethnic community."
>  Cintra Sooknanan:Tijani your wording is put in ...  in 3.1... Amongst
>the criteria proposed as required for an applicant to demonstrate
>financial need are:Minimum gross income covering at least the Financial
>Continued Operation Instrument Obligation described in the Applicant
>Guidebook that applies for the applicant;
>  Cintra Sooknanan:it is in black
>  Cintra Sooknanan:Yes I thought an applicant CAN ONLY have Technical
>need 
>  Cintra Sooknanan:as well as only financial need as well as both
>  Tijani:1.    Applications serving the public interest. (increasing skills;
>investment in the skills base of a target community; fostering gender
>balance and presence of minorities; positive contribution to regional or
>national economies; or meeting a need currently unmet by existing gTLDs
>etc.). The Application's public service and social relevance must be
>associated with at least one of the following categories of the Milestone
>Report, being:
>  Karla Valente:Few questions: (1) is this report going to reflect "full
>consensus" "partial consensus" etc. like the Milestome; (2) is the report
>going to recommend how the funding will be achieved keeping up with the
>cost neutral principle?
>  Olivier Crepin-Leblond:Karla: perhaps this question should be asked at
>the end of the current conference call
>  Olivier Crepin-Leblond:indigenous peoples
>  Cintra Sooknanan:sorry I was off the call for a short bit
>  Cintra Sooknanan:YES the point is the Applicant knows
>  Cintra Sooknanan:it is not Everyone that needs to know but the
>Applicant knows there may be contention
>  Tijani:€     Demonstrate applicant financial need and sustainability
>(3.1)and€      Aim at serving public interest and belong to at least one of
>the 6 listed categories (3.2)and€      Include a declaration that the
>applicant and the application are not ineligible for support (3.3)
>  Cintra Sooknanan:This was a good call
>  Cintra Sooknanan:thank you all
>  Cintra Sooknanan:We will make adjustments to the text and you can give
>comments on the wiki to the reworked text
>  Olivier Crepin-Leblond:Well done everybody. Well done Evan!
>  Cintra Sooknanan:next call please let us just focus on PART %
>  Cintra Sooknanan:5





<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy