<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Adobe Connect - Chat Transcript from Joint SO/AC WG on New gTLD Applicant Support
- To: "SOAC-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx" <SOAC-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Adobe Connect - Chat Transcript from Joint SO/AC WG on New gTLD Applicant Support
- From: Gisella Gruber-White <Gisella.Gruber-White@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 09:17:45 -0700
FYI
Thank you
Kind regards,
Gisella
On 03/05/2011 15:36, "Gisella Gruber-White"
<Gisella.Gruber-White@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Gisella Gruber-White:Welcome to the JAS Meeting on Tuesday 03 May 2011
> Gisella Gruber-White:Discussion document:
>https://community.icann.org/display/jaswg/JAS+Issues+and+Recommendations
> Cintra Sooknanan:Tijani I put it in
> Dev Anand Teelucksingh:minor suggested wordsmithing change : "A
>Community based application such as cultural, linguistic and ethnic" to
>"Application must be a community based gTLD that is operated for the
>benefit of either a cultural, linguistic or ethnic community."
> Cintra Sooknanan:Tijani your wording is put in ... in 3.1... Amongst
>the criteria proposed as required for an applicant to demonstrate
>financial need are:Minimum gross income covering at least the Financial
>Continued Operation Instrument Obligation described in the Applicant
>Guidebook that applies for the applicant;
> Cintra Sooknanan:it is in black
> Cintra Sooknanan:Yes I thought an applicant CAN ONLY have Technical
>need
> Cintra Sooknanan:as well as only financial need as well as both
> Tijani:1. Applications serving the public interest. (increasing skills;
>investment in the skills base of a target community; fostering gender
>balance and presence of minorities; positive contribution to regional or
>national economies; or meeting a need currently unmet by existing gTLDs
>etc.). The Application's public service and social relevance must be
>associated with at least one of the following categories of the Milestone
>Report, being:
> Karla Valente:Few questions: (1) is this report going to reflect "full
>consensus" "partial consensus" etc. like the Milestome; (2) is the report
>going to recommend how the funding will be achieved keeping up with the
>cost neutral principle?
> Olivier Crepin-Leblond:Karla: perhaps this question should be asked at
>the end of the current conference call
> Olivier Crepin-Leblond:indigenous peoples
> Cintra Sooknanan:sorry I was off the call for a short bit
> Cintra Sooknanan:YES the point is the Applicant knows
> Cintra Sooknanan:it is not Everyone that needs to know but the
>Applicant knows there may be contention
> Tijani:€ Demonstrate applicant financial need and sustainability
>(3.1)and€ Aim at serving public interest and belong to at least one of
>the 6 listed categories (3.2)and€ Include a declaration that the
>applicant and the application are not ineligible for support (3.3)
> Cintra Sooknanan:This was a good call
> Cintra Sooknanan:thank you all
> Cintra Sooknanan:We will make adjustments to the text and you can give
>comments on the wiki to the reworked text
> Olivier Crepin-Leblond:Well done everybody. Well done Evan!
> Cintra Sooknanan:next call please let us just focus on PART %
> Cintra Sooknanan:5
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|