Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Q&A - RyC and JAS WG - PLEASE REVIEW by Friday May 20

[Cintra Sooknanan <cintra.sooknanan@xxxxxxxxx>]

I don't normally do these but  +1

Even if we may not always agree, All opinions expressed are valuable and
certainly worthy of consideration. It's when we stop communicating that
things fall apart.

regards
Cintra Sooknanan



On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Evan Leibovitch <evan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi Mary,
>
> On 18 May 2011 11:06, <Mary.Wong@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>  Dear all,
>>
>> Thank you all for the hard work that's gone into this effort. Having been
>> graciously included on this mailing list as an observer from the GNSO
>> Council, I thought you might like to know that if some of this information
>> can be transmitted to the Council prior to the scheduled Council meeting
>> tomorrow (Thursday), it may be helpful to the Council as it considers a
>> motion relating to this group's Second Milestone Report that has been
>> proposed by Rafik.
>>
>
> This is an open and transparent mailing list, any comment expressed if able
> to be transferred.
>
> I would also make the comment that, as it is a sponsoring body with an
> interest in its outcome, I would hope that the GNSO would not need observers
> because it would have so many active particpants. Many of the active
> participants in this WG are on ALAC members, and at one time or another all
> of ALAC's executive committee has participated.
>
> Your involvement on Council is certainly no impediment from participation
> here; on the contrary, it is actively welcomed.
>
> (Well, by me at least....)
>
> - Evan
>
>