ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[soac-newgtldapsup-wg]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Re: key points from JAS WG/Board/GAC Meeting - please review asap

  • To: Karla Valente <karla.valente@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Re: key points from JAS WG/Board/GAC Meeting - please review asap
  • From: Carlton Samuels <carlton.samuels@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 09:49:35 -0500

Dear Karla:
Arrived Singapore just under 2 hours ago and seeing mail for the first time
since Thursday afternoon.

The notes support my recollection and the recording.  I OK with publication.

Best,
Carlton

==============================
Carlton A Samuels
Mobile: 876-818-1799
*Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround*
=============================


On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 10:12 PM, Karla Valente <karla.valente@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:

> Dear Rafik, Carlton:****
>
> ** **
>
> Please see attached the formatted key points with few edits I took the
> liberty to add. Please review before sending. ****
>
> My understanding is that one of you will forward this to the Board GAC,
> ALAC and GNSO chairs. ****
>
> ** **
>
> Please let me know what else you need from me in relation to this. ****
>
> ** **
>
> Kind regards,****
>
> ** **
>
> Karla Valente****
>
> Director, gTLD Registry Programs****
>
> Mobile:  +1 310 936 4639  ****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Rafik Dammak [mailto:rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx]
> *Sent:* Saturday, June 18, 2011 10:17 AM
> *To:* Karla Valente
> *Cc:* Carlton Samuels; SOAC-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* Re: key points from JAS WG/Board/GAC Meeting - please review
> asap****
>
> ** **
>
> Hello,****
>
> ** **
>
> that looks for my side, I think that some of our WG members are travelling
> but we should also send that asap, as the Board-GAC will have meeting
> tomorrow.****
>
> can you please format that,****
>
> ** **
>
> Best,****
>
>
> ****
>
> Rafik ****
>
> ** **
>
> 2011/6/17 Karla Valente <karla.valente@xxxxxxxxx>****
>
> Dear Rafik Carlton:****
>
>  ****
>
> Please see below the key points summary from the JASWG/Board/GAC meeting
> last Tuesday. Please let me know if you are in agreement. Once I have your
> feedback, I can format it in word if you want or you can send it directly to
> the Board and others. ****
>
>  ****
>
> *SO/AC new gTLD Applicant Support Working Group (JAS WG), Board, GAC
> Meeting*****
>
> Tuesday 07 June 2011 at 13:00 UTC.****
>
> For full transcript and recording: 
> http://gnso.icann.org/calendar/#<http://gnso.icann.org/calendar/>
> ****
>
> * *****
>
> *Key points *****
>
> ·        Singapore – should have as much interaction as possible****
>
> ·        When can the Jas WG finalize the work? ****
>
> ·        What kind of help does the JAS WG need to finalize the work?****
>
> ·        JAS WG needs feedback on the report to validate foundation and
> direction before it goes into implementation details. ****
>
> ·        How will we reconcile the JAS WG proposal, the Board discussion
> about a potential fund and the GAC issues raised?****
>
> ·        JAS WG proposal is not only about money support, but a more
> comprehensive approach****
>
> ·        JAS WG does not want needy applicants to be competing one against
> another.****
>
> ·        Should panel, process, structure be distanced from ICANN?****
>
> ·        Would the notion of another structure getting seed funding be a
> way to kick start the process, and make sure that the resources are ramping
> up with the actual needs fast enough so that there is no competition between
> the different potential requesters?****
>
> ·        There will be a need for some sort of evaluation panel. How could
> such an evaluation panel be formed in a way that would be sufficiently
> neutral and trustworthy? ****
>
> ·        How can we put in place a structure that is efficient and timely?
> ****
>
> ·        Demand for the Applicant Support. It is difficult to predict
> without the details about how this program will work, what it will offer,
> etc. There are too many variables. ICANN itself cannot predict applicants.
> More important than guessing demand, is to focus on “How much of an outreach
> do we as ICANN want to make to make sure that we have treated this issue
> fairly in developing economies?”****
>
> ·        What are the needs in the developing countries and how does
> having a top-level domain fit into meeting those needs? And that would be
> the basis for trying to organize a broader level of support, whether it’s
> funding or whether it’s expertise or whether it’s assistance in working
> through procedures or whatever.****
>
>  ****
>
>  ****
>
> Karla Valente****
>
> Director, gTLD Registry Programs****
>
> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)  ****
>
> Direct:  + 1 310 301 3878  ****
>
> Mobile:  +1 310 936 4639  ****
>
> *Skype: **kdlvalente*****
>
>  ****
>
> ** **
>


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy