<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] The JAS WG Agenda Going Forward
- To: Carlton Samuels <carlton.samuels@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] The JAS WG Agenda Going Forward
- From: "Michele Neylon :: Blacknight" <michele@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 08:40:32 +0000
Carlton
On 27 Jun 2011, at 09:32, Carlton Samuels wrote:
> Dear Colleagues:
> I shall be unable to join our scheduled call on Tuesday, 28th on account I
> shall be in the air somewhere between HKG and SFO. Our co-chair's
> availability is still not determined; communications disconnects. In any
> event, I shall frame for the record my own views on the journey for the next
> little while.
>
> Having witnessed Singapore, it appears now to me that the principal objective
> of this group is to prepare an information docket sufficiently detailed and
> readable to guide would-be applicants deemed worthy of support for applying
> for a new gTLD. I've seen this termed elsewhere as a "Needs-Assessed
> Applicant Guidebook". The name works for me. I'm estimating that this
> document must be ready for prime time by latest 2nd week of September.
>
> If we are severally agreed on the objective outlined above, then we are
> unanimous that this document must be equal in quality and style, if not
> detail, to the 2011-05-30 Applicant Guidebook, as amended.
>
> We are unanimous that we shall need significant additional staff support if
> we must make the deadline. Kurt Pritz has promised as much and so we will
> designate the the ALAC Chair to follow-up.
Is there a list somewhere of who is currently in the WG?
>
> Our starting point is the MR2 document. The scribes have agreed to review
> the redlined text to identify areas where work is needed. These areas will
> then become the focus of our intense analysis, week after week until we are
> satisfied that they are the best they can be. Staff support will be critical
> here. Because as the group settle on any given area, the staff will take the
> output and place it in our NAG, form ......and format previously agreed.
>
> Now, we already know some of the areas of need/clarification required;
> disqualification from consideration of certain government-type entities, fee
> reduction ala the GAC position, the $2M fund announced by ICANN and its role
> & use to which this might be applied etc., detail the additional needs for
> sustainability - like the registry/registrar services - and how those would
> be realized. You may add other 'hot' items as you see fit. I would recommend
> that we seek a discussion leader for each 'hot' item and use the list for
> the initial argy-bargy. The role of the co-chairs would then be to call for
> consensus around the emerging dominant idea from the list.
>
> I would think we have a duty of care to ensure that the new gTLD
> Communications Plan - which seems to be already decided - is sufficiently
> malleable to accept full responsibility for communicating the NAG and all
> that it offers.
It looks like that has already started at some level (though they're also
asking for feedback / input .. )
Regards
Michele
Mr Michele Neylon
Blacknight Solutions
Hosting & Colocation, Brand Protection
ICANN Accredited Registrar
http://www.blacknight.com/
http://blog.blacknight.com/
http://b.log.ie/
http://invadeeurope.eu/
http://www.gettingbusinessonline.ie/
http://rss.me/
http://mneylon.tel
Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072
US: 213-233-1612
UK: 0844 484 9361
Locall: 1850 929 929
Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090
Twitter: http://twitter.com/mneylon
PS: Check out our latest offers on domains & hosting: http://domainoffers.me/
-------------------------------
Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty
Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,Ireland Company No.: 370845
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|