ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[soac-newgtldapsup-wg]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] The JAS WG Agenda Going Forward

  • To: Carlton Samuels <carlton.samuels@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] The JAS WG Agenda Going Forward
  • From: "Michele Neylon :: Blacknight" <michele@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 08:40:32 +0000

Carlton

On 27 Jun 2011, at 09:32, Carlton Samuels wrote:

> Dear Colleagues:
> I shall be unable to join our scheduled call on Tuesday, 28th on account  I 
> shall be in the air somewhere between HKG and SFO.  Our co-chair's 
> availability is still not determined; communications disconnects.  In any 
> event, I shall frame for the record my own views on the journey for the next 
> little while.
> 
> Having witnessed Singapore, it appears now to me that the principal objective 
> of this group is to prepare an information docket sufficiently detailed and 
> readable to guide would-be applicants deemed worthy of support for applying 
> for a new gTLD. I've seen this termed elsewhere as a "Needs-Assessed 
> Applicant Guidebook".  The name works for me.  I'm estimating that this 
> document must be ready for prime time by latest 2nd week of September.
> 
> If we are severally agreed on the objective outlined above, then we are 
> unanimous that this document must be equal in quality and style, if not 
> detail, to the 2011-05-30 Applicant Guidebook, as amended.
> 
> We are unanimous that we shall need significant additional staff support if 
> we must make the deadline.  Kurt Pritz has promised as much and so we will 
> designate the the ALAC Chair to follow-up.

Is there a list somewhere of who is currently in the WG?

> 
> Our starting point is the MR2 document.  The scribes have agreed to review 
> the redlined text to identify areas where work is needed.  These areas will 
> then become the focus of our intense analysis, week after week until we are 
> satisfied that they are the best they can be. Staff support will be critical 
> here.  Because as the group settle on any given area, the staff will take the 
> output and place it in our NAG, form ......and format previously agreed. 
> 
> Now, we already know some of the areas of need/clarification required; 
> disqualification from consideration of certain government-type entities, fee 
> reduction ala the GAC position, the $2M fund announced by ICANN and its role 
> & use to which this might be applied etc., detail the additional needs for 
> sustainability - like the registry/registrar services - and how those would 
> be realized. You may add other 'hot' items as you see fit.  I would recommend 
> that we seek a discussion leader for each 'hot' item  and use the list for 
> the initial argy-bargy.   The role of the co-chairs would then be to call for 
> consensus around the emerging dominant idea from the list.
> 
> I would think we have a duty of care to ensure that the new gTLD 
> Communications Plan - which seems to be already decided - is sufficiently 
> malleable to accept full responsibility for communicating the NAG and all 
> that it offers. 

It looks like that has already started at some level (though they're also 
asking for feedback / input .. )

Regards

Michele

Mr Michele Neylon
Blacknight Solutions
Hosting & Colocation, Brand Protection
ICANN Accredited Registrar
http://www.blacknight.com/
http://blog.blacknight.com/
http://b.log.ie/
http://invadeeurope.eu/
http://www.gettingbusinessonline.ie/
http://rss.me/
http://mneylon.tel
Intl. +353 (0) 59  9183072
US: 213-233-1612 
UK: 0844 484 9361
Locall: 1850 929 929
Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090
Twitter: http://twitter.com/mneylon

PS: Check out our latest offers on domains & hosting: http://domainoffers.me/
-------------------------------
Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty
Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,Ireland  Company No.: 370845










<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy