Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] JAS Call Agenda - A Proposal

[Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>]

hi,

I don't really care about the principle - though I guess it seems a bit 
wasteful.  I would have suggested just alternating who went first.

But given that y'all want to alternate meetings would suggest that the Tuesday 
meeting (you did mean Tuesday not Monday?) not be the one I am responsible for 
since i will miss the second half hour of every other Tuesday meeting.

Also at what point do we start phasing this stuff into the final report draft 
so that we are talking about text that may be delivered?  Somehow I think we 
need to get to that step real soon now.

a.



On 13 Jul 2011, at 11:45, Carlton Samuels wrote:

> Dear All:
> The question of relegating a single issue to each of the remaining calls on 
> the JAS WG calendar has been raised.  For reasons already laid down, we now 
> are focusing on two matters to completion of this cycle : 1) Funding,funding 
> models, foundations etc led by Avri  2) In-kind contributions and works led 
> by Elaine.
> 
> We are proposing to reserve Monday calls to Subject #1 and Friday calls to 
> Subject #2.
> 
> We are further proposing that members are allowed to propose specific 
> detailed items in writing in this context at least 24 hours before  the call. 
>  
> 
> What say you all?
> 
> Carlton Samuels
> 
> ==============================
> Carlton A Samuels
> Mobile: 876-818-1799
> Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround
> =============================
> 
> 
>