Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] JAS WG Consensus Indicators - Request for Action

[Carlton Samuels <carlton.samuels@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Elaine:
Sorry for the confusion, was trying to be economical with words so let me
try again.

Start with accepting the fact that a community of interest might be best
served by two scripts. So we have two (2) applications from the same -
single - applicant. The questions are 1) whether an eligible applicant who
has proposed two separate applications could attract support for both
applications, i.e. both fall within the policy goal and assessed as 'needy'
2) Given objective, whether you could jointly - not singly, one after the
other - assess both applications.

Yes, processed by needs evaluators.  And yes, finally processed together by
ICANN.

Hope this helps.

Carlton

==============================
Carlton A Samuels
Mobile: 876-818-1799
*Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround*
=============================


On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 8:48 PM, Elaine Pruis
<elaine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Would you rephrase this please, I don't know what exactly you are asking:
>
> "The question then is whether this group would wish to encourage multiple
> needs-accessed applications from a single applicant and that they be
> processed as 'conjoint' applications?  "
>
> What is" needs -accessed?"
>
> How do you mean "processed"?  Processed by the needs evaluators? Processed
> by ICANN (where there is no system in place to process multiple scripts from
> regular applicants)?
>
> Thanks
>
> Elaine
>
>
> On Jul 17, 2011, at 11:41 AM, Carlton Samuels <carlton.samuels@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> The question then is whether this group would wish to encourage multiple
> needs-accessed applications from a single applicant and that they be
> processed as 'conjoint' applications?
>
>