[soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Re: proposed agenda for August 5 meeting + comments

[Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hello,

there is suggestion to extend the confcall to 1h30 as we are close to the
finalization of the report, if there is no objection, we can start at the
next call in Tuesday.
Thanks,

Best,

Rafik



2011/8/5 Carlton Samuels <carlton.samuels@xxxxxxxxx>

> Dear Karla:
> This work for me.
>
> Best,
> Carlton
>
>
>
>
> ==============================
> Carlton A Samuels
> Mobile: 876-818-1799
> *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround*
> =============================
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 6:26 PM, Karla Valente <karla.valente@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>
>> Dear Carlton,****
>>
>>
>> Here is the modified agenda, as I understand. ****
>>
>> Please note I am working on the public comment summary to add the late
>> posts and will try to finish it tonight in time for tomorrow’s meeting. *I
>> will send the revised summary asap. *
>>
>> Meanwhile, please see attached the one I sent to the WG on August 2 2011.
>> ****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> We might want to clarify what specific question the WG wants to ask Kurt
>> from last week’s conversations. ****
>>
>> *Agenda:*****
>>
>> ·         Roll call, SOI (2 min – staff, chairs)****
>>
>> ·         Public Comments from 2nd Milestone Report - Impact on Final
>> Report (5 min)****
>>
>> ·         Applicant Eligibility Requirements (15 min)****
>>
>> ·         Clarifications (5 min)****
>>
>> ·         Financial Need (15 min)****
>>
>> ·         Ineligibility criteria  (15 min)****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> Karla Valente****
>>
>> Director, gTLD Registry Programs****
>>
>> Mobile:  +1 310 936 4639  ****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> *From:* Carlton Samuels [mailto:carlton.samuels@xxxxxxxxx]
>> *Sent:* Thursday, August 04, 2011 4:01 PM
>> *To:* Karla Valente
>> *Cc:* Rafik; <SOAC-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
>> *Subject:* Re: proposed agenda for August 5 meeting + comments****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> Dear Karla:
>> ****
>>
>> Rafik and I agreed earlier this week to an agenda item: Responses to the
>> 2nd Milestone Report. ****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> Please edit and reserve 5 mins for an agenda item: "Public Comments from
>> 2nd Milestone Report - Impact on Final Report?.****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> Do please post the Summary of the Comments document staff prepared to the
>> list.  We will request that this be added to the Notes Section of Adobe Room
>> on tomorrow's call.****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> Kind regards,****
>>
>> Carlton****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>>
>> ==============================
>> Carlton A Samuels
>> Mobile: 876-818-1799
>> *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround*
>> =============================
>>
>> ****
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 5:50 PM, Karla Valente <karla.valente@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:****
>>
>> Dear Carlton and Rafik,****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> Here is a proposed agenda for tomorrow’s call, following our pre-published
>> schedule. Please let me know if you agree and I will post it on the Adobe
>> along with the text for review. In reviewing the content and timing we have
>> ahead, I recommend you consider extending one of the meetings (Tuesday) we
>> have weekly to 1h30.****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> *Agenda:*****
>>
>> ·         Roll call, SOI (2 min – staff, chairs)****
>>
>> ·         Clarification and closure of terminology, clarification on
>> question to Kurt – (3 min - Karla)****
>>
>> ·         Applicant Eligibility Requirements (15 min)****
>>
>> ·         Clarifications (5 min)****
>>
>> ·         Financial Need (15 min)****
>>
>> ·         Ineligibility criteria  (15 min)****
>>
>> The text to be reviewed is on Pages 12 to 16 of the draft Final Report
>> posted on the wiki and attached for your convenience:
>> https://community.icann.org/display/jaswg/SO-AC+New+gTLD+Applicant+Support+Working+Group+%28JAS-WG%29
>> ****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> *Below are some open issues Wendy captured that we believe pertain to the
>> topics to be discussed on August 5. *****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> 1.       Is the WG in agreement about the eligibility criteria? Staff
>> understands it is ideally a combination of subjective and objective
>> criteria, however, how can the objective criteria be more specific?****
>>
>> 2.       What information/documents applicants need to provide to
>> selection panel? The docs/info provided need to have flexibility and take
>> into account, for example, established vs new entities, types of applicant,
>> etc.****
>>
>> 3.       How will applicant demonstrate public interest?****
>>
>> 4.       How will applicant demonstrate financial capability and need?***
>> *
>>
>> 5.       How is need being determined? Do we distinguish financial need,
>> technical ability, need for assistance.  Information and process must be
>> consistent and have objective criteria to demonstrate the need.****
>>
>> 6.       What will the selection panel use to measure applicants against
>> the criteria?****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> *Ineligibility criteria*****
>>
>> 1.       Is the JAS WG making any changes based on GAC’s feedback during
>> the San Francisco Meeting?****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> *Non-financial support (in-kind)*****
>>
>> Are we in agreement the in-king support will be offered through a
>> dedicated webpage staff is designing that will only serve to simply
>> facilitate the encounter between applicants in need of support and
>> organizations offering support? ****
>>
>> NOTE: Staff still working on content, design, process. Current schedule is
>> to launch page in September.****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> Thank you,****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> Karla Valente****
>>
>> Director, gTLD Registry Programs****
>>
>> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)  ****
>>
>> Direct:  + 1 310 301 3878  ****
>>
>> Mobile:  +1 310 936 4639  ****
>>
>> *Skype: **kdlvalente*****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>
>