[soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Re: proposed agenda for August 5 meeting + comments

[Carlton Samuels <carlton.samuels@xxxxxxxxx>]

Dear Karla:
This work for me.

Best,
Carlton




==============================
Carlton A Samuels
Mobile: 876-818-1799
*Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround*
=============================


On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 6:26 PM, Karla Valente <karla.valente@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:

> Dear Carlton,****
>
>
> Here is the modified agenda, as I understand. ****
>
> Please note I am working on the public comment summary to add the late
> posts and will try to finish it tonight in time for tomorrow’s meeting. *I
> will send the revised summary asap. *
>
> Meanwhile, please see attached the one I sent to the WG on August 2 2011.*
> ***
>
> ** **
>
> We might want to clarify what specific question the WG wants to ask Kurt
> from last week’s conversations. ****
>
> *Agenda:*****
>
> ·         Roll call, SOI (2 min – staff, chairs)****
>
> ·         Public Comments from 2nd Milestone Report - Impact on Final
> Report (5 min)****
>
> ·         Applicant Eligibility Requirements (15 min)****
>
> ·         Clarifications (5 min)****
>
> ·         Financial Need (15 min)****
>
> ·         Ineligibility criteria  (15 min)****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> Karla Valente****
>
> Director, gTLD Registry Programs****
>
> Mobile:  +1 310 936 4639  ****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Carlton Samuels [mailto:carlton.samuels@xxxxxxxxx]
> *Sent:* Thursday, August 04, 2011 4:01 PM
> *To:* Karla Valente
> *Cc:* Rafik; <SOAC-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
> *Subject:* Re: proposed agenda for August 5 meeting + comments****
>
> ** **
>
> Dear Karla:
> ****
>
> Rafik and I agreed earlier this week to an agenda item: Responses to the
> 2nd Milestone Report. ****
>
> ** **
>
> Please edit and reserve 5 mins for an agenda item: "Public Comments from
> 2nd Milestone Report - Impact on Final Report?.****
>
> ** **
>
> Do please post the Summary of the Comments document staff prepared to the
> list.  We will request that this be added to the Notes Section of Adobe Room
> on tomorrow's call.****
>
> ** **
>
> Kind regards,****
>
> Carlton****
>
> ** **
>
>
> ==============================
> Carlton A Samuels
> Mobile: 876-818-1799
> *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround*
> =============================
>
> ****
>
> On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 5:50 PM, Karla Valente <karla.valente@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:****
>
> Dear Carlton and Rafik,****
>
>  ****
>
> Here is a proposed agenda for tomorrow’s call, following our pre-published
> schedule. Please let me know if you agree and I will post it on the Adobe
> along with the text for review. In reviewing the content and timing we have
> ahead, I recommend you consider extending one of the meetings (Tuesday) we
> have weekly to 1h30.****
>
>  ****
>
> *Agenda:*****
>
> ·         Roll call, SOI (2 min – staff, chairs)****
>
> ·         Clarification and closure of terminology, clarification on
> question to Kurt – (3 min - Karla)****
>
> ·         Applicant Eligibility Requirements (15 min)****
>
> ·         Clarifications (5 min)****
>
> ·         Financial Need (15 min)****
>
> ·         Ineligibility criteria  (15 min)****
>
> The text to be reviewed is on Pages 12 to 16 of the draft Final Report
> posted on the wiki and attached for your convenience:
> https://community.icann.org/display/jaswg/SO-AC+New+gTLD+Applicant+Support+Working+Group+%28JAS-WG%29
> ****
>
>  ****
>
> *Below are some open issues Wendy captured that we believe pertain to the
> topics to be discussed on August 5. *****
>
>  ****
>
> 1.       Is the WG in agreement about the eligibility criteria? Staff
> understands it is ideally a combination of subjective and objective
> criteria, however, how can the objective criteria be more specific?****
>
> 2.       What information/documents applicants need to provide to
> selection panel? The docs/info provided need to have flexibility and take
> into account, for example, established vs new entities, types of applicant,
> etc.****
>
> 3.       How will applicant demonstrate public interest?****
>
> 4.       How will applicant demonstrate financial capability and need?****
>
> 5.       How is need being determined? Do we distinguish financial need,
> technical ability, need for assistance.  Information and process must be
> consistent and have objective criteria to demonstrate the need.****
>
> 6.       What will the selection panel use to measure applicants against
> the criteria?****
>
>  ****
>
> *Ineligibility criteria*****
>
> 1.       Is the JAS WG making any changes based on GAC’s feedback during
> the San Francisco Meeting?****
>
>  ****
>
> *Non-financial support (in-kind)*****
>
> Are we in agreement the in-king support will be offered through a dedicated
> webpage staff is designing that will only serve to simply facilitate the
> encounter between applicants in need of support and organizations offering
> support? ****
>
> NOTE: Staff still working on content, design, process. Current schedule is
> to launch page in September.****
>
>  ****
>
>  ****
>
> Thank you,****
>
>  ****
>
> Karla Valente****
>
> Director, gTLD Registry Programs****
>
> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)  ****
>
> Direct:  + 1 310 301 3878  ****
>
> Mobile:  +1 310 936 4639  ****
>
> *Skype: **kdlvalente*****
>
>  ****
>
> ** **
>