<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Re: Contention outcomes
- To: avri@xxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Re: Contention outcomes
- From: ebw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 06:59:34 -0400
Avri,
You wrote:
> And yet, I did offer a method by which this recommendation could be
> inserted into our recommendations.
> To reiterate:
Whether string substitution is conditionally permitted for supported
appliations discovered to be in contention, involving a committee, or
is unconditionally permitted, is an implementation detail.
The policy question is whether substitution is part of support.
While Krista offered her opinion that substitution allows gaming, the
conditional-committee implemenation detail assumes her analysis is
correct. I'm unconvinced, where the mechanism is available only as a
form of support.
Eric
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|