Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Re: Contention outcomes

[Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>]

Hi,

>> conditional-committee implemenation detail assumes her analysis is
>> correct. 

Not necessarily.  

It assumes that since some beleive gaming might be a problem a solution should 
be offered, just in case they are correct.

I do not beleive we can resolve the existential question of whether there is a 
risk or not. But we can offer a solution to the possible problem.

a.



On 12 Aug 2011, at 11:59, ebw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> 
> Avri,
> 
> You wrote:
> 
>> And yet, I did offer a method by which this recommendation could be
>> inserted into our recommendations.
>> To reiterate:
> 
> Whether string substitution is conditionally permitted for supported
> appliations discovered to be in contention, involving a committee, or
> is unconditionally permitted, is an implementation detail.
> 
> The policy question is whether substitution is part of support.
> 
> While Krista offered her opinion that substitution allows gaming, the
> conditional-committee implemenation detail assumes her analysis is
> correct. I'm unconvinced, where the mechanism is available only as a
> form of support.
> 
> Eric
>