<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[soac-newgtldapsup-wg] JAS Adobe Connect chat transcript
- To: "SOAC-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx" <SOAC-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] JAS Adobe Connect chat transcript
- From: Glen de Saint Géry <Glen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 07:11:26 -0700
Carlton Samuels: Hi Everyone
Alex Gakuru: yes on mute
Alex Gakuru: Carlton: I'll manage to participate onlt for first half hour,
thanks
Carlton Samuels: Hi Alex...Notred...
Alex Gakuru: Hi, thanks Carlton.
Alan Greenberg: Sorry to be late. On now.
CLO: Hi Alan just getting started
Alex Gakuru: she'd sent apologies, i think.
Glen de Saint Gery: thanks Alex, I will note Elaine's apologies
Seth Greene: Cheryl, would you mind speaking up a bit.? There's interference.
Eric Brunner-Williams: the scope of "non-financial support" is not identical to
the scope of resources provided by contracted parties and "gtld consultants". i
don't think it is helpful to change the name of the work area and repurpose
in-kind to areas outside of the working scope of the in-kind subgroup.
Eric Brunner-Williams: as a provider of non-financial resources, any staff time
or any regulatory relief, icann itself is not a vendor or a "gtld consultant"
or a third party.
CLO: Seth I think the interference was noise in from someone elses line
Eric Brunner-Williams: who proposed this change, where is the rational for the
change of purpose, and when was it tested for consensus, as it is a substantive
change in the conceptualization of support, and as a matter of internal
housekeeping, if the elaine-lead group only (and reasonably) focused on
"in-kind" forms, then things elaine's group (or elaine individually) considered
out of scope -- not "in kind", are ignored.
CLO: yes Alan I was proposing a first time use of the term explanation (for
the record that like Eric I also do not "know" wjen this nomenclature
change was ratified OR agreed to such a change
CLO: as a Consensus call and a LIST was sent
CLO: hardle a majority rule
CLO: OR consensus
Alan Greenberg: I tend to support the concept that we should use terms in their
most common meaning instead of redefining well-used terms (I have scars in
relation to this). However, in this case we cannot afford the time to
re-discuss the issue, so let's define and then make sure we address all forms
of help SOMEWHERE.
CLO: and also FOR the record MY preference is or would be for the use of
In-Kind Support IF I had responded to any form of "consensus call on just that
term alone but YES agree with @Alan
Wendy Profit: I'm having trouble hearing CLO
Eric Brunner-Williams: the process problem is that a text, with unknown
authors, originated from the co-chair, is is "the consensus text", unless each
element of this unauthored text is specifically objected to. so "consensus"
means objection, to substitute terms used by the working group when it tasked
and formed subgroups. this is an unusual use of "consensus".
CLO: Sorry Wendy I'mNOT using the headset woth the excellent mic that I used
on the last call (for obvious reasons)
CLO: better technology does mean more pick up ;-)
Wendy Profit: :)
Eric Brunner-Williams: @clo, yes, but is hubby asleep?
Alex Gakuru: Hi all, sorry I have to drop off
Olivier Crepin-Leblond: LOL
CLO: He is indeed @ Eric and snoring quietly ;-)
Alex Gakuru: @CLO, :-)
Carlton Samuels: Take care Alex. Thanks for coming along
Olivier Crepin-Leblond: I don't really havemuch to add to it :-)
Alan Greenberg: OCL, if you are happy with what it say, please confirm...
Olivier Crepin-Leblond: I've pushed enough for IPv6 to be mandatory. Avri & I
have disagreed since 2008. :-)
Eric Brunner-Williams: clicking on
https://community.icann.org/display/jaswg/JAS+WG+Final+Report+--+WG+Comments
yeilds an error message
Eric Brunner-Williams: @seth see above
Eric Brunner-Williams: @seth, ignore, intermittent error.
CLO: Agree with Avri on the SQA getting the "acceptance / standing of course"
Eric Brunner-Williams: after looking i can't actually find the text under
discussion. help someone
CLO: @Eric I'm working from the notes text above
CLO: which shoiuld be from the draft report
Eric Brunner-Williams: apparently unmut is not supported
Wendy Profit: It's in the notes on the adobe scroll down
Eric Brunner-Williams: thanks
Eric Brunner-Williams: who wrote this "while the GAC has requested .... ASO to
assist ..." text?
Eric Brunner-Williams: then i'll hang.
Glen de Saint Géry
GNSO Secretariat
gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://gnso.icann.org
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|