ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[soac-newgtldapsup-wg]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Re: Process flow revised - need feedback

  • To: "soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx" <soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Re: Process flow revised - need feedback
  • From: Cheryl Langdon-Orr <langdonorr@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 07:06:27 +1000

Yup  indeed that is also how  I view it...

Cheryl Langdon-Orr
(CLO)



On 13 September 2011 02:57, Krista Papac <Krista.Papac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:

> I agree with Carlton. ****
>
> ** **
>
> *Krista Papac*
>
> Chief Strategy Officer****
>
> AusRegistry Group Pty Ltd****
>
> Email: krista.papac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx****
>
> Web: www.ausregistry.com****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* owner-soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:
> owner-soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Carlton Samuels
> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 06, 2011 5:59 AM
> *To:* Karla Valente
> *Cc:* Rafik Dammak; soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Re: Process flow revised - need feedback
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> Dear Karla:
> ****
>
> Thanks for this.  With regard process, I'm inclined to see all three of
> your proposals for use as legitimate.****
>
> ** **
>
> In fact, the intent of the process flowchart is to provide information and
> as guidance for staff to create the detailed actionable process.****
>
> ** **
>
> Kind regards,****
>
> Carlton****
>
> ** **
>
> ==============================
> Carlton A Samuels
> Mobile: 876-818-1799
> *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround*
> =============================
>
> ****
>
> On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 11:06 PM, Karla Valente <karla.valente@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:****
>
> Dear Carlton, Rafik,****
>
>  ****
>
> In have done some work on the process flow chart. See attached the revised
> version, per *my* interpretation of the Report.  I would like to emphasize
> that it is only intended to illustrate the process *very general and high
> level* (not detailed level). A more detailed level would be complicated at
> this point with the Final report so close to publication. There are at least
> three possible options for its use:****
>
>  ****
>
> 1.  Include the revised chart in the Final Report as illustrative of the
> framework of the WG recommendations;****
>
> 2.  Use the chart to illustrate the recommendation in the upcoming webinar;
> and/or****
>
> 3.  Use the new chart purely as the basis for helping staff to begin work
> on a more detailed flowchart that identifies all the potential process steps
> that will have to be developed to implement the WG recommendations.****
>
>  ****
>
> It would be great if the JAS WG members could review and give me a feedback
> on the chart, but I do not wish to distract the agenda from what is planned
> for tomorrow since there is still much to be done to finish the report.***
> *
>
>  ****
>
> Apologies in advance if there is any misinterpretation of the proposed
> process by the WG.****
>
>  ****
>
> I look forward to hear from you.****
>
>  ****
>
> Kind regards,****
>
>  ****
>
> Karla Valente****
>
> Director, gTLD Registry Programs****
>
> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)  ****
>
> Direct:  + 1 310 301 3878  ****
>
> Mobile:  +1 310 936 4639  ****
>
> *Skype: **kdlvalente*****
>
>  ****
>
> ** **
>


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy