[soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Re: Avri, Alan : here is the Webinar power point for you review

[Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>]

Not having seen anything, I have reviewed the 
presentation hand have a number of points below. 
So changes, some questions about what an item in 
the report means. I am comfortable doing either 
1st or second half. So Avri can choose.
Alan

======================
Comments and questions:

1. Suggest putting slide numbers on slides

2. On slide 3, what is meaning of blue/black/red?

3. On slide 9, the lower left oval is not 
attached to Service to Public. Is this a subtle message?
4. On slide 10: "An applicant for a gTLD string 
that is not a generic word intended to reference 
a specific commercial entity (commonly referred 
to within ICANN as a "dot-brand");"
If that is what the report says, I think we got 
it wrong. That would rule out Apple (a generic 
word intended to reference the computer company), 
but would not rule out .greenberg, the TLD that I 
plan to apply for my for-profit consulting 
company (it is not a generic word). Would also let in .ibm, .sanyo….
Perhaps in this slide just say "An applicant for 
a gTLD string that is intended to reference a 
specific commercial entity (commonly referred to 
within ICANN as a "dot-brand");" and worry about the report separately.
5. Slide 12/3: I thought we said that the fee 
reduction is not "Financial Support" with upper 
case F/S. And we should explicitly say somewhere 
that this reduction is not to be funded by the 
$2m+ (perhap we do later but I haven't got there yet).
6. On slide 19, do you have any idea what 
"Evidence of any previous project fund" means? Which project??
7. On same slide: "Recommendations regarding the 
ability to form a sustainable operation". Rec 
from whom?? Perhaps means References from people?
8. Will slide 21 actually display properly??

9. Slide 22: Consideration by GNSO, ALAC and THEN Board.

10. Same slide: "Publication of MR2 for Summary 
Analysis"?? "Perhaps Publication of MR2 Comment Summary Analysis"?


At 14/09/2011 04:38 PM, Karla Valente wrote:
> Dear Avri, Alan,
>
> Please see attached the first draft of the power 
> point for the webinar. I kept it simple, but it 
> still have many slides and we need to be mindful about the Q&A.
> In order to do reviews, I suggest the following process:
>
> 1.       Avri and Alan decide on which part each will present
> 2.       Avri sends to Alan suggested reordering 
> of slides based on sequence agreed + changes to content
> 3.       Alan sends Final to Karla
>
> Does this work for you?
> If yes, once this is done, I will ensure the ppt 
> is ready and uploaded in the system for our dry-run and webinars.
> The presentation total time is 90 minutes.
>  I have sent the proposal below and I did not 
> hear any objections. Let me know if you are still in agreement.
> Proposed structure of presentation:
> 1 minute (Karla) - explain the webinar 
> structure, remind Q&A at the end. Introduce 
> Carlton and Rafik. Open to suggestions if you want someone else to do this.
> 1 minute (Carlton) - welcome, explain what the 
> JAS WG is, how long has it been working,  how is composed, its goal.
> 1 minute (Rafik) - explain the next steps (GNSO, 
> ALAC consideration) + public comment + Dakar 
> board consideration and special session. Introduce Avri and Alan.
> 20 minutes (Avri)
> 20 minutes (Alan)
> Remaining time: Q&A moderated by Rafik and/or 
> Carlton. Note I will help to gather questions from the chat.
> Thank you,
>
> Karla Valente
> Director, gTLD Registry Programs
> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
> Direct:  + 1 310 301 3878
> Mobile:  +1 310 936 4639
> Skype: kdlvalente