RE: [ssac-gnso-irdwg] IRD-WG/Related Meetings in Cartagena and Next Meeting

["Owen Smigelski" <Owen.Smigelski@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Julie,

 

Checking the link below from Steve, the dates are listed as:

 

 

 

It thus does appear that the comment period was extended to March 14,
2010 (not 2011).  

 

Regards,

 

Owen

 

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:  This message is intended only for the use of
the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain
information that is privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure
under applicable law. If you have received this email in error, please
immediately notify the sender by return email and delete this email and
any attachments from your system.

 

From: owner-ssac-gnso-irdwg@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-ssac-gnso-irdwg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Julie Hedlund
Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2010 04:16
To: Metalitz, Steven; Ird
Subject: Re: [ssac-gnso-irdwg] IRD-WG/Related Meetings in Cartagena and
Next Meeting

 

Steve,

As mentioned in one of our previous meetings when the Working Group
requested translations I noted that the comment period must be the same
for the translations as it is for the English version.  The Working
Group agreed on 60 days as the comment period.  The translations were
added last Friday and the comment period was extended by 60 days (the
original period) accordingly.

Thanks,
Julie


On 12/6/10 10:49 PM, "Metalitz, Steven" <met@xxxxxxx> wrote:

I may have missed this, but any explanation for why the public comment
period was extended by two months?  (Or minus ten months if read
literally...) 
http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#ird

________________________________

From: owner-ssac-gnso-irdwg@xxxxxxxxx [
mailto:owner-ssac-gnso-irdwg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Julie Hedlund
Sent: Sunday, December 05, 2010 8:04 AM
To: Ird
Subject: [ssac-gnso-irdwg] IRD-WG/Related Meetings in Cartagena and Next
Meeting

Dear IRD-WG members,

Edmon Chung's presentation for the GNSO Council at its Working Session
yesterday went very well.  Several Council members had the following
questions/comments that we thought you would find interesting:

1.      Have the WG considered adding a language tag to the  contact
data?   
2.      Where does the original and transliterated/translated  data
reside? Registrars, registries?   
3.      How would IRD affect searchable Whois?   
4.      Are there multiple transliteration standards for a  single
language, if so, would this result in inconsistent transliterations?    
5.      Concern that the issues being discussed by the WG will  be
difficult for Councilors who are not technical experts to understand.  


Below are the remaining IRD-Related meetings for the week.  Please let
me know if you have any questions.

Best regards,

Julie

Public Session: IRD-WG Interim Report (For remote access and details
see: http://cartagena39.icann.org/node/15309)
Where: Barahona 3
When, Thursday, 09 December, 0930-1100 local time (1430-1600
UTC/0630-0800 PST/0930-1100 EST)

Public Session: Technical Evolution of Whois Services (For remote access
and details see: http://cartagena39.icann.org/node/15423)
Where: Barahona 3
When, Thursday, 09 December, 1100-1200 local time (1600-1700
UTC/0800-0900 PST/1100-1200 EST)