<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ssac-gnso-irdwg] IRD-WG/Related Meetings in Cartagena and Next Meeting
- To: Owen Smigelski <Owen.Smigelski@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ird <ssac-gnso-irdwg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [ssac-gnso-irdwg] IRD-WG/Related Meetings in Cartagena and Next Meeting
- From: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 10:04:58 -0800
Thanks Owen. That is obviously a typo. We’ll get it fixed. It should be 14
March 2011.
Julie
On 12/7/10 12:42 PM, "Owen Smigelski" <Owen.Smigelski@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Julie,
Checking the link below from Steve, the dates are listed as:
[cid:3374571898_1696504]
It thus does appear that the comment period was extended to March 14, 2010 (not
2011).
Regards,
Owen
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This message is intended only for the use of the
individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that
is privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law.
If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender
by return email and delete this email and any attachments from your system.
From: owner-ssac-gnso-irdwg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-ssac-gnso-irdwg@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Julie Hedlund
Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2010 04:16
To: Metalitz, Steven; Ird
Subject: Re: [ssac-gnso-irdwg] IRD-WG/Related Meetings in Cartagena and Next
Meeting
Steve,
As mentioned in one of our previous meetings when the Working Group requested
translations I noted that the comment period must be the same for the
translations as it is for the English version. The Working Group agreed on 60
days as the comment period. The translations were added last Friday and the
comment period was extended by 60 days (the original period) accordingly.
Thanks,
Julie
On 12/6/10 10:49 PM, "Metalitz, Steven" <met@xxxxxxx> wrote:
I may have missed this, but any explanation for why the public comment period
was extended by two months? (Or minus ten months if read literally...)
http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#ird
________________________________
From: owner-ssac-gnso-irdwg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-ssac-gnso-irdwg@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Julie Hedlund
Sent: Sunday, December 05, 2010 8:04 AM
To: Ird
Subject: [ssac-gnso-irdwg] IRD-WG/Related Meetings in Cartagena and Next Meeting
Dear IRD-WG members,
Edmon Chung’s presentation for the GNSO Council at its Working Session
yesterday went very well. Several Council members had the following
questions/comments that we thought you would find interesting:
1. Have the WG considered adding a language tag to the contact data?
2. Where does the original and transliterated/translated data reside?
Registrars, registries?
3. How would IRD affect searchable Whois?
4. Are there multiple transliteration standards for a single language, if
so, would this result in inconsistent transliterations?
5. Concern that the issues being discussed by the WG will be difficult for
Councilors who are not technical experts to understand.
Below are the remaining IRD-Related meetings for the week. Please let me know
if you have any questions.
Best regards,
Julie
Public Session: IRD-WG Interim Report (For remote access and details see:
http://cartagena39.icann.org/node/15309)
Where: Barahona 3
When, Thursday, 09 December, 0930-1100 local time (1430-1600 UTC/0630-0800
PST/0930-1100 EST)
Public Session: Technical Evolution of Whois Services (For remote access and
details see: http://cartagena39.icann.org/node/15423)
Where: Barahona 3
When, Thursday, 09 December, 1100-1200 local time (1600-1700 UTC/0800-0900
PST/1100-1200 EST)
![PNG image](pngY3tunmfmlP.png)
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|