Re: [ssac-gnso-irdwg] IRD-WG/Related Meetings in Cartagena and Next Meeting

[Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Owen.  That is obviously a typo.  We’ll get it fixed.  It should be 14 
March 2011.

Julie


On 12/7/10 12:42 PM, "Owen Smigelski" <Owen.Smigelski@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi Julie,

Checking the link below from Steve, the dates are listed as:

[cid:3374571898_1696504]

It thus does appear that the comment period was extended to March 14, 2010 (not 
2011).

Regards,

Owen


CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:  This message is intended only for the use of the 
individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that 
is privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. 
If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender 
by return email and delete this email and any attachments from your system.


From: owner-ssac-gnso-irdwg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-ssac-gnso-irdwg@xxxxxxxxx] 
On Behalf Of Julie Hedlund
Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2010 04:16
To: Metalitz, Steven; Ird
Subject: Re: [ssac-gnso-irdwg] IRD-WG/Related Meetings in Cartagena and Next 
Meeting

Steve,

As mentioned in one of our previous meetings when the Working Group requested 
translations I noted that the comment period must be the same for the 
translations as it is for the English version.  The Working Group agreed on 60 
days as the comment period.  The translations were added last Friday and the 
comment period was extended by 60 days (the original period) accordingly.

Thanks,
Julie


On 12/6/10 10:49 PM, "Metalitz, Steven" <met@xxxxxxx> wrote:
I may have missed this, but any explanation for why the public comment period 
was extended by two months?  (Or minus ten months if read literally...)
http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#ird

________________________________

From: owner-ssac-gnso-irdwg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-ssac-gnso-irdwg@xxxxxxxxx] 
On Behalf Of Julie Hedlund
Sent: Sunday, December 05, 2010 8:04 AM
To: Ird
Subject: [ssac-gnso-irdwg] IRD-WG/Related Meetings in Cartagena and Next Meeting

Dear IRD-WG members,

Edmon Chung’s presentation for the GNSO Council at its Working Session 
yesterday went very well.  Several Council members had the following 
questions/comments that we thought you would find interesting:

 1.  Have the WG considered adding a language tag to the  contact data?
 2.  Where does the original and transliterated/translated  data reside? 
Registrars, registries?
 3.  How would IRD affect searchable Whois?
 4.  Are there multiple transliteration standards for a  single language, if 
so, would this result in inconsistent transliterations?
 5.  Concern that the issues being discussed by the WG will  be difficult for 
Councilors who are not technical experts to understand.

Below are the remaining IRD-Related meetings for the week.  Please let me know 
if you have any questions.

Best regards,

Julie

Public Session: IRD-WG Interim Report (For remote access and details see: 
http://cartagena39.icann.org/node/15309)
Where: Barahona 3
When, Thursday, 09 December, 0930-1100 local time (1430-1600 UTC/0630-0800 
PST/0930-1100 EST)

Public Session: Technical Evolution of Whois Services (For remote access and 
details see: http://cartagena39.icann.org/node/15423)
Where: Barahona 3
When, Thursday, 09 December, 1100-1200 local time (1600-1700 UTC/0800-0900 
PST/1100-1200 EST)