Re: [ssac-gnso-irdwg] REMINDER FOR REVIEW: Final Report of the IRD-WG (Draft)

["Jiankang YAO" <yaojk@xxxxxxxx>]

FW: [ssac-gnso-irdwg] REMINDER FOR REVIEW: Final Report of the IRD-WG (Draft)I 
have looked through this report.
I thinkt that it is in good shape and ready to go.

Jiankang Yao
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Julie Hedlund 
  To: ssac-gnso-irdwg@xxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Saturday, January 14, 2012 9:14 PM
  Subject: FW: [ssac-gnso-irdwg] REMINDER FOR REVIEW: Final Report of the 
IRD-WG (Draft)


  Dear IRD-WG members,

  Attached are the comments from Scott Austin for your consideration.

  Best regards,

  Julie


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  From: owner-ssac-gnso-irdwg@xxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:owner-ssac-gnso-irdwg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Julie Hedlund
  Sent: Friday, January 13, 2012 8:54 AM
  To: ssac-gnso-irdwg@xxxxxxxxx
  Subject: [ssac-gnso-irdwg] REMINDER FOR REVIEW: Final Report of the IRD-WG 
(Draft)

  Dear IRD-WG members,

  This is a reminder that we need your comments on the attached report.  The 
deadline was 11 January but we will extend it to give you more time for a 
review.  Please review this draft of the Final Report and send and questions, 
comments, or concerns by **COB Wednesday, 18 January.**

  Attached in word and PDF is a draft of the Final Report of the 
Internationalized Registration Data Working Group for your review.  Steve Sheng 
and I have tried to capture the changes agreed to based on the comments 
received in the public forum and discussed in subsequent meetings.  The changes 
are included in redline for ease of review.  

  NOTE: It will be extremely helpful if you could respond to this message even 
if you have no changes to the document to indicate that you have read it and 
agree with it.  Also, if you have any objections to the document please suggest 
revisions that would address your concerns.  This is an important step because 
once the report is finalized we will ask the Chairs to send it to the GNSO and 
SSAC for approval with the assumption that it has the approval of all of the 
IRD-WG members (or if there are objections they are noted in the report).  Of 
course, if this document changes substantially in this review we will send 
another version and we may also schedule a meeting to discuss it if the WG 
desires it.

  Thank you very much for your assistance.

  Best regards,

  Julie

   
   

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  San Francisco * San Diego * Los Angeles * Sacramento * Orange County * Las 
Vegas * Portland * Seattle * Houston * Chicago * Phoenix * Dallas * New York * 
Long Island * Florham Park * Denver * Miami * Atlanta * Austin * Hartford

  This email communication may contain CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION WHICH ALSO MAY 
BE LEGALLY PRIVILEGED and is intended only for the use of the intended 
recipients identified above. If you are not the intended recipient of this 
communication, you are hereby notified that any unauthorized review, use, 
dissemination, distribution, downloading, or copying of this communication is 
strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient and have received 
this communication in error, please immediately notify us by reply email, 
delete the communication and destroy all copies.
  IRS CIRCULAR 230 DISCLOSURE
  To ensure compliance with requirements by the IRS, we inform you that any 
U.S. tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is 
not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) 
avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing 
or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein. 
  GORDON & REES LLP 
  http://www.gordonrees.com <http://www.gordonrees.com/> 



  ------ End of Forwarded Message