Re: [transfers-wg] Unofficial 6/13 Notes

["GNSO.SECRETARIAT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Here is the MP3 recording if this will help in any way.

http://audio.icann.org/gnso/transfers.mp3

Thanks,

Glen

Ross Rader a écrit :
> Here are my unofficial notes from the 6/13 call. If I've missed or 
> misrepresented something, please let me know. Thank you to everyone that 
> participated.
>
> Participants:
>
> Olof Nordling
> Karen Lentz
> Margie Milam
> Barbara Steele (from the beach)
> Ross Rader
>
> 1. Last call for comments on issues 30-38.  No comments
>
> 2. Last call for comments on Draft-Transfer-Advisor and
> DenialClarifications.
>
> Definition of "Registrar Hold"
> Margie - is there a definition of "registrar hold", Karen - no, but we 
> can add one. Barbara - we should use the list of domain statuses from 
> the EPP protocol.
>
> Purpose of advisory
> Margie - what is the purpose of the advisory?
> Karen - published by ICANN, posted on the website, sent specifically to 
> registrars. Is basically reminders and clarifications of the policy from 
> the perspective of staff.
>
> Definition of "Transfer"
> Margie - is it possible to clarify the meaning of transfer in terms of 
> this policy? Karen - possibly yes, but might require policy development. 
> Ross: wasn't the earlier policy clear on this point? i.e. all policy 
> recommendations were made in the context of being related to 
> "Inter-registrar Transfers" as per the title of the document, etc.
>
> 3. Review of registry and other constituency feedback.
> Registry Constituency Feedback
> Barbara - rryc feedback: change of registrant close to change of 
> registrar is problematic. History of whois data would be useful (chain 
> of title). A lot of the problems will need to be addressed and supported 
> by Registrars. Registries will be involved, but the registrars always 
> sit at the front end.
>
> General Community Feedback
> Karen - one additional issue has been raised in connection with the 
> discussion of the registerfly incident from Twomey's questions: i.e. 
> should registrants be able to retrieve auth codes from third parties 
> other than their registrar?
>
> Discussion: This is a good idea at a high level, but further work is 
> required to figure out what the specifics would be. This is definitely 
> an area that new policy would be required to implement. #39.
>
> 4. Discussion of suggestions for incorporating EPP experiences in Final
> Report
> Barbara - not aware of any EPP specific issues, Ross: Concur. Margie - 
> registrars should clarify to their customers how auth-codes are 
> obtained. Discussion: There was general agreement that this be added to 
> the advisory.
>
> 5. All other business - we had a brief discussion regarding next steps. 
> Ross will coordinate with Karen to update the working group documents 
> and draft a communication to Council. These will be distributed to the 
> working group for comments and revisions prior to official transmission 
> to the Council. The GNSO Council will determine what final steps, if 
> any, are warranted in terms of new policy development.


--
Glen de Saint Géry
GNSO Secretariat - ICANN
gnso.secretariat[at]gnso.icann.org
http://gnso.icann.org