RE: [transfers-wg] Unofficial 6/13 Notes

["Steele, Barbara" <BSteele@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Glen,
I saw that after I sent the initial e-mail.

Thanks for the minutes Ross.  Sorry for the confusion - still catching up on 
e-mail.   


-------------------------------------------------------
Barbara Steele
Compliance Officer
VeriSign Information Services
bsteele@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Direct: 703.948.3343
Mobile: 703.622.1071
Fax:  703.421.4873

 
21345 Ridgetop Circle
Dulles, VA  20166


Notice to Recipient:  This e-mail contains confidential, proprietary and/or 
Registry Sensitive information intended solely for the recipient and, thus may 
not be retransmitted, reproduced or disclosed without the prior written consent 
of VeriSign Naming and Directory Services.  If you have received this e-mail 
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone or reply 
e-mail and destroy the original message without making a copy.  Thank you.


-----Original Message-----
From: GNSO.SECRETARIAT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 12:22 PM
To: Steele, Barbara; transfers-wg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [transfers-wg] Unofficial 6/13 Notes

Hi Barbara,
Thanks, but I take no merit for the minutes, that all goes to Ross who provided 
them and distributed them. The only thing I added was the MP3 for what use it 
may be.

Glen

Steele, Barbara a écrit :
> Hi Glen,
> The minutes look good to me.  Thanks for distributing them. 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> Barbara Steele
> Compliance Officer
> VeriSign Information Services
> bsteele@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Direct: 703.948.3343
> Mobile: 703.622.1071
> Fax:  703.421.4873
> 
>  
> 21345 Ridgetop Circle
> Dulles, VA  20166
> 
> 
> Notice to Recipient:  This e-mail contains confidential, proprietary and/or 
> Registry Sensitive information intended solely for the recipient and, thus 
> may not be retransmitted, reproduced or disclosed without the prior written 
> consent of VeriSign Naming and Directory Services.  If you have received this 
> e-mail message in error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone or 
> reply e-mail and destroy the original message without making a copy.  Thank 
> you.
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-transfers-wg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-transfers-wg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
> GNSO.SECRETARIAT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2007 5:16 AM
> To: transfers-wg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [transfers-wg] Unofficial 6/13 Notes
> 
> Here is the MP3 recording if this will help in any way.
> 
> http://audio.icann.org/gnso/transfers.mp3
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Glen
> 
> Ross Rader a écrit :
>> Here are my unofficial notes from the 6/13 call. If I've missed or 
>> misrepresented something, please let me know. Thank you to everyone 
>> that participated.
>>
>> Participants:
>>
>> Olof Nordling
>> Karen Lentz
>> Margie Milam
>> Barbara Steele (from the beach)
>> Ross Rader
>>
>> 1. Last call for comments on issues 30-38.  No comments
>>
>> 2. Last call for comments on Draft-Transfer-Advisor and 
>> DenialClarifications.
>>
>> Definition of "Registrar Hold"
>> Margie - is there a definition of "registrar hold", Karen - no, but 
>> we can add one. Barbara - we should use the list of domain statuses 
>> from the EPP protocol.
>>
>> Purpose of advisory
>> Margie - what is the purpose of the advisory?
>> Karen - published by ICANN, posted on the website, sent specifically 
>> to registrars. Is basically reminders and clarifications of the 
>> policy from the perspective of staff.
>>
>> Definition of "Transfer"
>> Margie - is it possible to clarify the meaning of transfer in terms 
>> of this policy? Karen - possibly yes, but might require policy development.
>> Ross: wasn't the earlier policy clear on this point? i.e. all policy 
>> recommendations were made in the context of being related to 
>> "Inter-registrar Transfers" as per the title of the document, etc.
>>
>> 3. Review of registry and other constituency feedback.
>> Registry Constituency Feedback
>> Barbara - rryc feedback: change of registrant close to change of 
>> registrar is problematic. History of whois data would be useful 
>> (chain of title). A lot of the problems will need to be addressed and 
>> supported by Registrars. Registries will be involved, but the 
>> registrars always sit at the front end.
>>
>> General Community Feedback
>> Karen - one additional issue has been raised in connection with the 
>> discussion of the registerfly incident from Twomey's questions: i.e.
>> should registrants be able to retrieve auth codes from third parties 
>> other than their registrar?
>>
>> Discussion: This is a good idea at a high level, but further work is 
>> required to figure out what the specifics would be. This is 
>> definitely an area that new policy would be required to implement. #39.
>>
>> 4. Discussion of suggestions for incorporating EPP experiences in 
>> Final Report Barbara - not aware of any EPP specific issues, Ross:
>> Concur. Margie - registrars should clarify to their customers how 
>> auth-codes are obtained. Discussion: There was general agreement that 
>> this be added to the advisory.
>>
>> 5. All other business - we had a brief discussion regarding next steps. 
>> Ross will coordinate with Karen to update the working group documents 
>> and draft a communication to Council. These will be distributed to 
>> the working group for comments and revisions prior to official 
>> transmission to the Council. The GNSO Council will determine what 
>> final steps, if any, are warranted in terms of new policy development.
>>
>>
> 
> 
> --
> Glen de Saint Géry
> GNSO Secretariat - ICANN
> gnso.secretariat[at]gnso.icann.org
> http://gnso.icann.org
> 


--
Glen de Saint Géry
GNSO Secretariat - ICANN
gnso.secretariat[at]gnso.icann.org
http://gnso.icann.org