<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Registrar Stakeholder Group Comments - Vertical Integration Initial Report
- To: "vi-pdp-initial-report@xxxxxxxxx" <vi-pdp-initial-report@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Registrar Stakeholder Group Comments - Vertical Integration Initial Report
- From: "Clarke D. Walton" <clarke.walton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 07:15:29 -0400
BACKGROUND
The Registrar Stakeholder Group ("RrSG") is providing comments regarding the
Initial Report on Vertical Integration Between Registrars and Registries ("VI
Initial Report"). This position paper captures the overall sentiment expressed
by the RrSG members who provided feedback about this matter. Due to time
constraints, however, no formal vote regarding this position paper was taken.
RrSG POSITION
The RrSG appreciates the effort of the Vertical Integration Working Group ("VI
WG") and respects the VI WG's commitment to evaluating the proposed solutions
regarding vertical integration between registrars and registries for New TLDs.
The RrSG recognizes the importance of resolving the vertical integration
question in a manner that not only considers the interests of ICANN
stakeholders but also balances those interests with the interests of consumers
and the public. Members from the RrSG, however, have participated in the
debate regarding registrar-registry separation for New TLDs for more than two
years. This extended period of time negatively impacts consumer and public
interests as the introduction of New TLDs is continually and indeterminately
delayed.
ICANN should move forward by evaluating the VI WG's proposed solutions and the
related community comments then ICANN should quickly, positively and firmly
decide on a resolution to the question of vertical integration between
registrars and registries, as such would inure to the benefit of consumers and
the public interest.
CONCLUSION
The opinions expressed by the RrSG in this position paper should not be
interpreted to reflect the individual opinion of any particular RrSG member.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|