Re: [alac] Further work on WHOIS.
In that case, it seems to me should discuss this, figure out what we can do that makes sense given the timing, and that you (thomas) should deliver whatever input we can produce in a timely way, without waiting for the group to select a liaison. Pointing out the impact is not the same as producing a global opinion, and I think it is something we should do. (for which I had volunteered... but I am in the middle of getting ready for my conference, the one that is unfortunately the same time as Rio...)
At 12:41 PM 2/11/2003, Thomas Roessler wrote:
The TF will include any "constituency impact reviews" received with its final report when it goes to the GNSO council on February 20. I wonder if we should do such a review with respect to individual internet users and domain name holders. That could be a relatively brief statement which discusses the impact of the individual policy and procedural recommendations.
The conversation continues..... at http://www.edventure.com/conversation/
PC Forum 2003 - March 23 to 25, Phoenix Who? what? where? Data comes alive!