Re: [alac] WIPO2 comments to ICANN

[Erick Iriarte Ahon <faia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi!

This is not more clear for me:

"Once again, it seems more appropriate for each country to control its name 
(and related strings as it chooses) in its unique ccTLD, where the matter 
can be addressed on a national level according to national law, not to 
grant it monopoly rights in character strings across all TLDs."

what mean national law?? for what? por use their country name??
this make more confusion than the another phrase..

and if this a "Preliminary Analysis of the Recommendations"... i think this 
make some problem's with the cctld community.

Erick



At 11:01 p.m. 12/05/2003 +0200, Vittorio Bertola wrote:
> On Mon, 12 May 2003 09:35:40 -0500, you wrote:
>
> >Well.
> >
> >but the phrase maybe can make some confusion, we need to put in the 
> document?
>
> We've slightly rephrased the sentence to make it clearer. I'm about to send
> out the final document (deadline is now :/ ).
> --
> vb.               [Vittorio Bertola - v.bertola [a] bertola.eu.org]<------
> --------> http://bertola.eu.org/ - Archivio FAQ e molto altro... <--------