RE: [alac] Proposed process for At Large Structure applications

[Izumi AIZU <izumi@xxxxxxx>]

I will follow the format Tommy made:

At 08:15 03/10/03 +0900, Matsumoto, Tommy wrote:

> Questions:
> - is 2 weeks a reasonable time for the review?

Izumi: I think that is reasonable.

> - should the reviewer be an ICANN staff person, or should he/she be a
> Committee member (perhaps from the same Region as the applicant) chosen
> by rotation? Or perhaps a group composed by staff + members from the Region?
>
> Tommy   ;       I recommend Staff + Member from the region

Izumi: Yes, Staff + three ALAC members from that region.

> - should there be a recommendation with the report, or just a report?
>
> Tommy   ;       A recommendation with the report

Izumi: Yes, a recommendation with the report.

> - should the report and/or recommendation of the reviewer be
> confidential to Committee members, or public?
>
> Tommy   ;       I think it will be confidential to Committee

Izumi: I think it should be open to public in principle with exception
         when the ALAC finds certain good reasons not to make it open.

> - is 3 days a reasonable time for voting? (also, to approve do we need
> 2/3 of those who vote, or 2/3 of all members?)
>
> Tommy   ;       5 days will be reasonable and 2/3 of those who vote with
> over 2/3 member's vote

Izumi: 5 working days and 2/3 votes over 2/3 members.


> - should individual votes be public or private?
>
> Tommy   ;       Private

Izumi: private


Thanks Vittorio and Tommy,

izumi