ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[At-Large Advisory Committee]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[alac] Losing SiteFinder

  • To: alac@xxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: [alac] Losing SiteFinder
  • From: Wendy Seltzer <wendy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 04 Oct 2003 10:54:38 -0700

I just posted this to the alac.info, and suggest it might be a starting point for an ALAC statement welcoming the suspension of SIteFinder:

ICANN demanded[1], at last, that the SiteFinder disservice be suspended, and VeriSign grudgingly complied. As EFF's Seth Schoen notes[2], VeriSign complains[3] of not getting a hearing when they gave none to the Internet community before launching wildcards. Likewise, they fuss about notice to the community[4] only after giving none to that same community impacted when wildcard resolution was launched.

SiteFinder should not be suspended because breaks hundreds of specific applications; it should be stopped because it breaks with the end-to-end architecture[5] of the Internet to give one company monopolistic control of a resource in the center. It's not a contest between SiteFinder's search page and MSN's, but between giving VeriSign sole, centralized control of the error-handling for incorrect URLs and distributing that choice among users and applications at the edge of the network. The contest is rather SiteFinder versus (MSN or simple language-appropriate error message or WAP-provider's response or SiteFinder or ...), with that choice repeated across the variety of services that use DNS. Keeping SiteFinder out of the center leaves the greatest flexibility in the netowrk for those who want to add new protocols, services, and features on the ends.

ICANN has called for "further evaluation and study" of the impact of SiteFinder. The proper evaluation is for VeriSign to determine whether it will reimplement its advertiser-supported search as an option at the edge of the network or not at all.

[1] <a href="http://www.icann.org/announcements/advisory-03oct03.htm";>demanded -- icann.org </a>
[2] <a href="http://www.eff.org/news/breaking/archives/2003_10.php#000503";>EFF's Seth Schoen notes -- eff.org </a>
[3] <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A42107-2003Oct3.html";>complains -- washingtonpost.com </a>
[4] <a href="http://www.merit.edu/mail.archives/nanog/msg14917.html";>notice to the community -- nanog mailing list archive</a>
[5] <a href="http://web.mit.edu/Saltzer/www/publications/endtoend/endtoend.pdf";>end-to-end architecture -- web.mit.edu </a>


--
Wendy Seltzer -- wendy@xxxxxxxxxxx
Staff Attorney, Electronic Frontier Foundation
Fellow, Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard Law School
http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/seltzer.html
Chilling Effects: http://www.chillingeffects.org/




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy