RE: [alac] Revised statement on registry services

["Roberto Gaetano" <alac_liaison@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Yes, it does.
Due to time constraints, I am only quickly going through these documents, as 
I am currently focusing more on the accreditation and mainly on the outreach 
of potential ALS.
Specifically, I believe that it is very important to distribute this 
material to accreditated ALS, and solicit their feedback.
Regards,
Roberto GAETANO
ALAC
ICANN BoD Liaison





> From: Thomas Roessler <roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: alac@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [alac] Revised statement on registry services
> Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 00:24:05 +0100
>
> I'm attaching a slightly revised version of the proposed registry
> services statement that attempts to take into account the feed-back
> I had so far.  I'd propose that this document (minus change
> tracking, of course) is put out for public comment, and is sent to
> accredited at-large structures for their feed-back.  At the same
> time, I'd also like to forward this to the council as a preliminary
> statement, with the caveat that we are soliciting comments and may
> be following up with a summary of the additional input we are
> receiving.
>
> Does this work for you guys?
>
> Regards,
> --
> Thomas Roessler  <roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> At-Large Advisory Committee: http://alac.info/
> << alac-on-regsvcs.pdf >>

_________________________________________________________________
Help STOP SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*  
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail