Re: [alac] Re: Amsterdam Strategic Plan Meeting: Shouldn't we be represented there?

[Izumi AIZU <aizu@xxxxxxx>]

I was trying to find the meeting notice, and
GNSO's website did not provide that. I thought I missed something.
Now, it makes sense.

I quite agree with Thomas. The Strategic plan deserves our
attention - in conjunction with our own review - well, I am
still struggling to write the draft - so sorry, but in any case
we need to be there and I appreciate if Thomas could take
time to go there and hope the travel funds be provided.

izumi


At 01:25 05/01/29 +0100, you wrote:
> On 2005-01-29 01:09:53 +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote:
>
> > last Monday, I had posted the announcement of the GNSO's
> > Amsterdam strategic plan meeting. [1] The meeting's purpose is to
> > devise comments on the strategic plan. The resources that are
> > being spent on this indicate that considerable effort is being
> > put into these comments by other constituencies inside ICANN.
> >
> > 1. http://forum.icann.org/mail-archive/alac/msg00901.html
>
> Apologies; I confused some messages in the list archive.
>
> I sent the original pointer on Jan 19 [1].  The actual invitation to
> the meeting is at [2].
>
> 1. http://forum.icann.org/mail-archive/alac/msg00899.html
> 2. http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/msg00741.html
>
> Regards,
> --
> Thomas Roessler キ Personal soap box at <http://log.does-not-exist.org/>.