[alac] Sanctions program?
Danny Younger noted the following on the ICANN Comment page: The new .com agreement fails to include a Sanctions Program. Why should VeriSign be exempt from the Sanctions Program? Why do they get special treatment? What's the point of setting up a compliance program, hiring compliance officers, and promoting compliance activities to the DOC in the Oct.7 Status Report if VeriSign doesn't have to abide by the same provisions as every other unsponsored TLD registry? http://forum.icann.org/lists/settlement-comments/msg00011.html This strikes me as a big deal. Thoughts? Bret