[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Comments from TWNIC (.tw) on Compiled Recommendation of the ccNSO Assistance Group 20-Mar-2003 The ccNSO Assistance Group has published its recommendation regarding the new ccNSO under the reformed ICANN structure. Once again TWNIC appreciates the effort and contribution that the AG has made to the ccTLD community and would like to make the following comments in views of: 1. Global Interest 2. A ccTLD Registry 3. An IDN Adopter 1. Global Interest 1.1 TWNIC is glad to see the formation of the ccNSO and look forward to participating and contributing to the Organization. 1.2 TWNIC believes that the ccNSO has an unavoidable mission of creating a public forum to discuss common concerns and issues of the ccTLD community, as well as assisting ccTLD registries in developing countries under reasonable methodology and budget. 1.3 ICANN sponsored ccTLD registries shall play a bridging role for a better mutual-understanding working environment between ICANN and the ccTLD community. 2. As a ccTLD Registry 2.1 The ccNSO needs to determine the source of budget for its future operation in a "lightweight" scale. The future revenue received from membership fee shall be allocated primarily on: a. the PDP. b. Accelerating the level of participation of the ccTLD community. c. Organizing training or promotional programs to assist ccTLD registry's DN business development. 2.2 The ccNSO must clarify, in detail, the usage and obligation of funding from ICANN (to support the ccNSO secretariat operation) as stated in its FY03-04 budget plan. 2.3 The ccNSO should welcome participation, fee or no fee, but Council members of the ccNSO should be the committed members who recognize the role play of the ccNSO and contribute to its funding. 2.4 The ccNSO must reserve rights to review candidates sent by NomCom for the ccNSO council. 2.5 The efficiency and diversity of Launching Group of the ccNSO definitely plays the key role for its future development. Thus the Rio meeting must determine the selection criteria of the ccNSO Launching Group members. The Rio meeting must set the benchmark (for operational efficiency of the LG) and prepare a backup plan (if it doesn't work out) for the ccNSO Launching Group 3. As an IDN Adopter 3.1 The most concerned issue in many ccTLD is the IDN implementation in the upcoming future. Every ccTLD has its local Internet linguistic requirement and is facing numerous complicated issues (registration policy, dispute policy, cultural influence, etc.). It lacks the presence of mechanism for IDN and other DN related issues in the formation of the ccNSO. It is truly necessary to have appropriate mechanism to include IDN in the ccNSO structure. [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index] |