> As for ccTLDs being used for gTLDs: that is a fact.Would not argue with you
there. Never have, never will.
> opening up of .net and .org was the end of structure
and prettiness in TLD-structures. So why moan about this?
This forum is the place
to talk about the future of TLD. To do that it is best to look at the past. You learn
from history. For instance - do you trust everything your Government tells you?
>
Accept it and face this reality:
Everyone wants their .com name. The ccTLDs are
second or third choice. So will .web and their likes be. They are not and never will
be nobledot.com's.
Spot on, agree with you 100 percent. Although I have not got
garryanderson.com - even though it is still available. I would really have liked
it, but HAD TO make this point: *snippet from protest site*
(I) got the less prestigious
dot CO dot UK instead. It is more important that customers can find and recognize
you, than being Mr 'IGotThereFirst.COM'. MOST businesses cannot have the .COM they
want.
> So why have more of them?
Well, there is another family elsewhere that
would not mind the schneiders.new domain you chucked away. Also, small business needs
dot REG to protect THEIR trademark on the Internet. Also, it gives you greater freedom.
Also, .........
WIPO.org.uk is nothing to do with WIPO.org