Return to newtlds Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username:	Venster
Date/Time:	Fri, June 30, 2000 at 8:21 PM GMT
Browser:	Netscape Communicator V4.61 using XWindows/FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT
Score:	5
Subject:	Meta Question?
Message:
"But might I suggest that we not forget that this discussion forum is for the creation of new TLDs in general, not just .web. Just because our .web registry is the longest-standing pioneer registry and has generated a lot of controversy should not stop discussion of the meta-question at hand: how should new TLDs be created?" Ah, the meta question is already how, not whether-or-not. Thanks for telling us, as someone who is in the business for a longer time. I shall give up the useless battle against new generic gTLD's and spend my time in setting up a new site, the name of which is below (I still have to run for it though). I plan to sell scripts for the land run. I would therefore like to answer your question ("How should the new TLDs be created?") thus: All in a similar way, to make scripting not too difficult. It would be best if we all had a fair chance in the run.
Link:	Yokohama - Oklahoma (working tomorrow...)

Message Thread:

• Concentrate on the Issues at hand — cambler, June 28 @ 5:10 AM (3/4)
• Meta Question? — Venster, June 30 @ 8:21 PM (0/0)
• The Isuues--Serious Post — Voice Of Reason, June 29 @ 3:14 PM (1/1)
• LET US VOTE ON IT — Garry Anderson, June 29 @ 7:28 PM (0/0)
• Ditto — Greg Krajewski, June 29 @ 12:16 AM (0/0)

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy