[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
-----Original Message----- From: Joanna Lane [mailto:jo-uk@rcn.com] Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 4:36 AM To: Thomas Roessler; ga@dnso.org Subject: RE: [ga] Transfers Implementation Thomas, A comment period of less than7 days is generally regarded as insufficient time to support the claim that the community has had a reasonable opportunity to comment on a policy paper. Please advise ICANN Staff that they must allow for that as a minimum timeframe in future, or they can expect systematic rejection of all papers that are presented, regardless of the merits of the policies. Thanks, Joanna > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-ga@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-ga@gnso.icann.org]On Behalf > Of Thomas Roessler > Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 1:49 PM > To: ga@dnso.org > Subject: [ga] Transfers Implementation > > > Things are moving on transfers implementation. Draft RAA changes > are available at <http://alac.info/archives/000627.html>; draft > standard forms are posted at <http://alac.info/archives/000612.html>. > > Comments are welcome, but would be most useful when (1) made during > the next couple of hours, and (2) either posted to alac.info, or to > the GA list. > > Apologies for the tight time line, but some of this is last minute > stuff. > > Regards, > -- > Thomas Roessler · Personal soap box at <http://log.does-not-exist.org/>. [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index] |