Here is the letter in it's entirety from Tucows (dtd
15 Apr 00)THIS is hypocrisy, in that THEY write such a strong letter against the
Sunrise ...but now align themselves with Afilias who would like to have a Sunrise....and
PLEASE read the letter in its entirety.....(my comments about the Sunrise will be
separate)
(TUCOWs Letter dtd 15 Apr 00 to Michael Palage Chair of WG-B)
15 April,
2000
Michael Palage
Chair, Working Group B/Registrars Constituency Secretariat
Domain Name Supporting Organization
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names
and Numbers
Michael,
TUCOWS.com Inc. is responding in the limited time
available to your
request that we comunicate our views concerning the latest
proposals from
the Intellectual Property Constituency, called "sunrise plus twenty."
While we are aware that you are acting as best you can in limited
circumstances
of budget and time, TUCOWS must protest the inadequate
consultation that has
taken place in regard to these proposals, and must
on grounds of substance reject
them in their entirety. We find it
increasingly anomalous that the secretary
of the registrars association is
acting to compromise the interests of IP holders
with the interests of the
vast mass of Internet users in this way.
The
essence of ICANN's problem is the disproportionate attention which is
being given
inside the working groups, and, increasingly outside, in
private conferences,
to the pretensions of the IP community to stall the
process of domain name expansion,
on grounds that we and our Internet
users consider to be dubious and, in some
cases, in outright error: error
both as to policy as regards the future direction
of the Internet, and
more fundamentally, as to their power to hold up domain
name expansion
based on the monopoly of the NSI over the root server.
You
have received commentary from John Berryhill, which, in our view,
devastates
the position of the IPC that they are entitled to extra-legal
privileges in the
matter of establishing domain names for famous names,
and lately, for all trade
mark holders in all countries.
The IPC's contentions that trade mark holders
are owed a special set of
privileges regarding domain names, different from and
superior to those
worked out in national legislatures, is not something that
other users of
the Internet need to accept. Moreover, it is unnecessary. The
fastest way
to eradicate the problem that the IPC pretends to solve is to have
a
rapid, large expansion of domain names. The IPC is threatened by this
approach
because it diminshes the value of what they are protecting, and
the value fo
the services they render.
The issue is not, as they suppose, "confusion" in
the marketplace, or
the protection of consumers. It is the protection of the
economic
position of intellectual property lawyers.
What we are actually
observing in the saga of domain name expansion is a
power-grab of major proportions
over the architecture of the Internet,
using ICANN not so much as a representative
forum for IP interests as the
embodimenet of IP lawyers' interests. This tendency
is not good for the
Net, for Internet users, for small businesses which need
the increase of
namespace, and ultimately it will lead, if unchecked by common
sense and
contrary interests, to the avoidance of the DNS and the downfall of
ICANN.
The policy that should be followed in relation to IP interests is this:
no privilege shall be granted to any trade mark or famous name holder by
ICANN
that is not available under domestic trade mark law. We understand
that this
principle will need adjustment to accord with the global nature
of top level
domains, but by sticking to it ICANN will do better for the
Internet, for millions
of users, and even for the interests of IP owners,
than a policy of restriction.
TUCOWS has been supporting reasonable compromise between IP owners and
domain
name expansion for some time. On reflection, We have decided that
we are not
going to get domain name expansion in this way, and that we are
in fact acceding
to a takeover of the political processes of ICANN by a
set of interests that
oppose what the Internet stands for. We urge you to
reconsider the nature of
the compromises you may be making, and what you
may consider to be realistic.
To us at TUCOWS, compromise with the kinds
of proposals we are seeing coming
from the IPC will get us nowhere.
Yours sincerely,
Ross Wm. Rader
Director,
Assigned Names Division
TUCOWS.com Inc.