Return to tldreport Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username: allens
Date/Time: Wed, November 15, 2000 at 7:19 PM GMT (Wed, November 15, 2000 at 2:19 PM EST)
Browser: Netscape Communicator V4.7 using XWindows/IRIX64 6.4
Score: 5
Subject: .kids = censorship enabling. Period.

Message:
 

 
Quite simply, ICANN cannot establish a .kids domain without both
biasing the Internet in favor of a certain variety of speech (namely
that proposed by the .kids TLD administrators) and increasing
censorship, both of children and of adults. Yes, adults. Do you
seriously believe that the various countries who are in favor of
censoring content for adults _won't_ use a .kids domain as an additional filter? They can tighten up their attempted filtering on
everything else, if there's something (i.e., educational material)
in .kids that they're letting through.

Furthermore, there is a fundamental difference in leaving a child
unattended in "real life" and letting that child see uncensored
information. Unless you've been silly enough to tell your kids your
credit card information, they can't do any harm to themselves with
online action only - meeting a "pedophile" takes physical action,
for instance. If you believe that people can harm themselves by
viewing images, I'd like to ask if you're in favor of preventing
viewing "Schindler's List" (or the nightly news, for that matter...).
If you want to believe that _any_ image viewing can harm someone,
there's a lot more evidence for violent images doing so than there
is for sexually explicit images. (All the research has shown so far
is that they're arousing... not a real surprise.)

Moreover, none of the entities which would use a .kids domain for
censoring what children can access (parents, governments, and schools
being chief among them) can be trusted to not filter out information
that any rational individual would agree that children should have
access to, namely sex education (lifesaving, particularly with
AIDS and high rates of non-heterosexual teen suicide). (Other areas
include material on alternative religions such as my own (Unitarian
Universalist) paganism.) Not only will it be easier to do general web
filtering with a .kids domain in existence, even if the .kids TLD
administrators are more rational than to filter out the above
information (despite demands from fundamentalists and other
pro-censorship forces to do so), it will be easier to filter a limited
.kids domain further than to try filtering down the entire web.

All in all, what people quite simply need to learn to do is to trust
their children. Parents can't mold their children into what they
want them to be like; they have to accept that their children are
their own selves.

-Allen
     

 

Link: Peacefire


Message Thread:


Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy