<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[wildcard-comments] Verisign DNS hijack
- To: wildcard-comments@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [wildcard-comments] Verisign DNS hijack
- From: GX <gx8080@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2003 17:26:15 -0400 (GMT-04:00)
- Reply-to: GX <gx8080@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Sender: owner-wildcard-comments@xxxxxxxxx
The Internet lives and dies by the standards that have been publicly defined in
the RFC documents. The RFC process has allowed the public to participate and
comment on the organization of the Internet (a form of self government). These
standards form the basis for the social "contract" that allows different types
of computers, operating systems and devices to properly coexist and communicate
on the Internet. The public has not agreed to the changes that Verisign has
implemented.
Sure, users who misspell a web address into Microsoft Internet Explorer or
Netscape Navigator may be redirected to a Microsoft or Netscape site intended
to help them out. But this can easily be turned off, if the user finds this
behavior objectionable. In addition, this behavior does not degrade the
Internet in any way, such as break my e-mail, anti-spam software or other
applications that were coded to agreed standards. There is a perceived benefit
for both, part of the user community and the commercial organization. What
Verisign has done, is to degrade the entire user community's environment for
their own commercial interests. Their behavior has no redeeming value to any
part of the Internet community. There no social good in what Verisign is doing.
It has intentionally broken the social "contract" and is refusing to stop this
destructive behavior. If this behavior continues, VeriSign should be stripped
of its contract to control the root servers.
If ICANN ultimately decides that the effects of the Verisign Site Finder
service are not as destructive as the Internet community feels it is, Verisign
should not be given this valueable "real estate" for free. The public should
receive some reimbersement for the use of this. This is only fair, because this
"real estate" was not part of the the original contract (RFCs). It is estimated
that Verisign will make about $150 million from the Site Finder service. There
is enough profit for Verisign to pay for the the use of this "real estate".
Gus Xenakis
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|