<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [alac] NeuStar
- To: "'John L'" <johnl@xxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [alac] NeuStar
- From: Sebastián Ricciardi <sricciardi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 15:59:33 -0300
John,
You´ve raised a good point. Should we push for an amendment in the UDRP
asking a cheaper procedure for Users ??
-----Mensaje original-----
De: John L [mailto:johnl@xxxxxxxx]
Enviado el: Martes, 05 de Septiembre de 2006 01:07 p.m.
Para: Sebastian Ricciardi
CC: 'ALAC'
Asunto: Re: [alac] NeuStar
> An interesting decision regarding Neustar, Domain Parking and UDRP:
Hmmn. Neustar noticed that neustar.net was being squatted on by
well known squatter Trafficz. They filed a UDRP complaint, Trafficz
didn't even reply, and they won by default.
That would be great if it didn't cost over a thousand dollars just to file
the complaint.
> HYPERLINK
>
"http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/decisions/html/2006/d2006-0816.html"http
> ://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/decisions/html/2006/d2006-0816.html
Regards,
John Levine, johnl@xxxxxxxx, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for
Dummies",
Information Superhighwayman wanna-be, http://johnlevine.com, Mayor
"I dropped the toothpaste", said Tom, crestfallenly.
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.11.7/437 - Release Date: 04/09/2006
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|