ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[bc-gnso]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [bc-gnso] Clarification as to which draft Charter to comment upon

  • To: "BC Secretariat" <secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "BC gnso" <bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [bc-gnso] Clarification as to which draft Charter to comment upon
  • From: "HASSAN Ayesha" <ayesha.hassan@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 12:14:02 +0200

Dear colleagues,

 

I would like to suggest the addition of clear language in 3.3.2 to
ensure that business associations like ICC and others who have members
who belong to other ICANN constituencies are not excluded from BC
membership because of the range of their membership. See suggested
addition below in yellow highlighting and underlined. Text to this
effect would ensure that business organizations like ICC, USCIB and
others can remain BC members.

Best regards,

Ayesha

 

3.3. Membership Criteria

3.3.1 In keeping with the selective membership criteria of other GNSO
constituencies, the Business Constituency represents the interests of a
specific sector of Internet users. The purpose of the Constituency is to
represent the interests of businesses described in Article 3.1.

 

3.3.2 To avoid conflicts of interest this excludes: not for profit
entities excepting trade associations representing for profit entities;
entities whose prime business is a registry, registry operator,
prospective registry, registrar, reseller, other domain name supplier
interests, or similar; other groups whose interests may not be aligned
with business users described in Article 3.1. Trade associations whose
members may also include companies/associations that belong to or could
belong to any of the other ICANN constituencies are not excluded from BC
membership.

 

 

________________________________

From: owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of BC Secretariat
Sent: mercredi 21 octobre 2009 11:19
To: BC gnso
Subject: [bc-gnso] Clarification as to which draft Charter to comment
upon

 

Posted on behalf of the BC Officers

 

 

Dear Members,

 

Consequent to some queries regarding which draft of the Charter members
should comment upon.  For clarification and to save the little time left
in terms of the Charter submission please note that the Charter under
discussion and for comments is the 'BC charter 2009 v16.doc' which is
attached for members' convenience.

 

BC Officers

 

 



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy