ICANN ICANN Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [bc-gnso] Clarification as to which draft Charter to comment upon

  • To: "'HASSAN Ayesha'" <ayesha.hassan@xxxxxxxxxx>, "'BC Secretariat'" <secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'BC gnso'" <bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [bc-gnso] Clarification as to which draft Charter to comment upon
  • From: "Zahid Jamil" <zahid@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 16:26:26 +0600

I agree that this would be an important addition to the existing draft
Zahid Jamil
Jamil & Jamil
219-221 Central Hotel Annexe
Merewether Road, Karachi. Pakistan
Cell: +923008238230
Tel: +92 21 5680760 / 5685276 / 5655025
Fax: +92 21 5655026
 <http://www.jamilandjamil.com/> www.jamilandjamil.com
Notice / Disclaimer
This message contains confidential information and its contents are being
communicated only for the intended recipients . If you are not the intended
recipient you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.
Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this
message by mistake and delete it from your system. The contents above may
contain/are the intellectual property of Jamil & Jamil, Barristers-at-Law,
and constitute privileged information protected by attorney client
privilege. The reproduction, publication, use, amendment, modification of
any kind whatsoever of any part or parts (including photocopying or storing
it in any medium by electronic means whether or not transiently or
incidentally or some other use of this communication) without prior written
permission and consent of Jamil & Jamil is prohibited.
From: owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 4:14 PM
To: BC Secretariat; BC gnso
Subject: RE: [bc-gnso] Clarification as to which draft Charter to comment
Dear colleagues,
I would like to suggest the addition of clear language in 3.3.2 to ensure
that business associations like ICC and others who have members who belong
to other ICANN constituencies are not excluded from BC membership because of
the range of their membership. See suggested addition below in yellow
highlighting and underlined. Text to this effect would ensure that business
organizations like ICC, USCIB and others can remain BC members.
Best regards,
3.3. Membership Criteria
3.3.1 In keeping with the selective membership criteria of other GNSO
constituencies, the Business Constituency represents the interests of a
specific sector of Internet users. The purpose of the Constituency is to
represent the interests of businesses described in Article 3.1.
3.3.2 To avoid conflicts of interest this excludes: not for profit entities
excepting trade associations representing for profit entities; entities
whose prime business is a registry, registry operator, prospective registry,
registrar, reseller, other domain name supplier interests, or similar; other
groups whose interests may not be aligned with business users described in
Article 3.1. Trade associations whose members may also include
companies/associations that belong to or could belong to any of the other
ICANN constituencies are not excluded from BC membership.

From: owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
BC Secretariat
Sent: mercredi 21 octobre 2009 11:19
To: BC gnso
Subject: [bc-gnso] Clarification as to which draft Charter to comment upon
Posted on behalf of the BC Officers
Dear Members,
Consequent to some queries regarding which draft of the Charter members
should comment upon.  For clarification and to save the little time left in
terms of the Charter submission please note that the Charter under
discussion and for comments is the 'BC charter 2009 v16.doc' which is
attached for members' convenience.
BC Officers

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy