<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [bc-gnso] Vested interests - status quo - market incumbents - anti trust
- To: "Philip Sheppard" <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [bc-gnso] Vested interests - status quo - market incumbents - anti trust
- From: <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 12:24:12 -0700
<html><body><span style="font-family:Verdana; color:#000000;
font-size:10pt;"><div>Philip,</div><div><br></div><div>This is a matter on
which I would like to participate.</div><div><br></div><div>By way of a
self-nomination, my clients' interests include registries, registrars and
registrants -- including large, branded companies. In this way I am
unable to exert bias for any one without alienating the others!
</div><div><br></div><div>Let me know if there is a chance to
participate.</div><div><br></div><div>Cheers,</div><div><br></div><div>Berard<br></div>
<blockquote id="replyBlockquote" webmail="1" style="border-left: 2px solid
blue; margin-left: 8px; padding-left: 8px; font-size: 10pt; color: black;
font-family: verdana;">
<div id="wmQuoteWrapper">
-------- Original Message --------<br>
Subject: [bc-gnso] Vested interests - status quo - market incumbents -<br>
anti trust<br>
From: "Philip Sheppard" <<a
href="mailto:philip.sheppard@xxxxxx";>philip.sheppard@xxxxxx</a>><br>
Date: Wed, August 11, 2010 12:46 am<br>
To: "'bc - GNSO list'" <<a
href="mailto:bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx";>bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx</a>><br>
<br>
<div><font face="Arial" size="2"><span class="203154207-11082010">In the
context of the VI debater Mike R has made a telling
comment:</span></font></div> <div><font face="Arial" size="2"><span
class="203154207-11082010"></span></font> </div> <div><font
color="#1f497d" face="Calibri"><span class="203154207-11082010">"I do not think
it possible to get the support of parties who have a vested economic interest
in the status quo"</span></font></div> <div><font color="#1f497d"
face="Calibri"><span class="203154207-11082010"></span></font> </div>
<div><font face="Arial" size="2"><span class="203154207-11082010">This to my
mind is one of the key flaws of the WG model of policy development.
Incumbents are able to manipulate future markets.</span></font></div>
<div><font face="Arial" size="2"><span class="203154207-11082010">This has
anti-trust implications.</span></font></div> <div><font face="Arial"
size="2"><span class="203154207-11082010"></span></font> </div> <div><font
face="Arial" size="2"><span class="203154207-11082010">A User House project
could usefully take this up for broader discussion.</span></font></div>
<div><font face="Arial" size="2"><span class="203154207-11082010">First steps
would by CSG agreement to do so.</span></font></div> <div><font face="Arial"
size="2"><span class="203154207-11082010">Sarah - would you be willing to take
this forward?</span></font></div> <div><font face="Arial" size="2"><span
class="203154207-11082010"></span></font> </div> <div><font face="Arial"
size="2"><span class="203154207-11082010">Philip</span></font></div>
</div>
</blockquote></span></body></html>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|