Re: [bc-gnso] charter/process topic? mandate use of open lists

["Marilyn Cade " <marilynscade@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Good idea. Election issues do belong on private list. Tranactional and policy 
on public. 
Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T

-----Original Message-----
From: Mike O'Connor <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 15:00:35 
To: <bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [bc-gnso] charter/process topic?  mandate use of open lists

hi all,

this is another post inspired by my recent conversation with Danny Younger.  

in this case the question is whether we would like to strengthen the language 
about use of private email lists in our charter.  i note that we've started to 
backslide a little bit here in the BC in that we're starting to see more 
conversation on the private list than the public one, which leads to concerns 
about transparency.  

i think it would be a good idea to review the language in both the CSG and BC 
charters to make sure that we're making it difficult for ourselves to retreat 
from public view.  

mikey


- - - - - - - - -
phone    651-647-6109  
fax              866-280-2356  
web      http://www.haven2.com
handle  OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google, etc.)